Teams

Cartee Tri18s W 4.5/4.0/3.5

2024 Piedmont Tri-Level 18 & Over · 4.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 DoublesLinda Helms / Alison Crews vs Elizabeth Gill / Jordan Hedrick7-6, 6-0
2024-07-10vs Nutt - Tri18s W 4.5/4.0/3.5 WedSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlison Crews / Aundrea Hendley vs Lauren Nutt / Beth Mayer7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesErin Huffines / Lynn Guglielmo vs Tara Burgio / Cari Powell3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesLynn Guglielmo / Alison Crews vs Blair Churchill / Cathy Soblesky0-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-06-06vs Nutt - Tri18s W 4.5/4.0/3.5 WedLost 02
L#1 DoublesKissie Stroup / Alison Crews vs Denise Speight / Tiffany Brown0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMimi Cartee / Erin Huffines vs Lauren Nutt / Cari Powell2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-05-22vs Smith Tri18s 4.5/4.0/3.5 W WedLost 01
L#2 DoublesErin Huffines / Kristin Williamson vs Sarah Stafford / Sarah Dunning3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Linda Helms
published
4.04
Alison Crews
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.97
Aundrea Hendley
published 4.5
3.91
Kristin Williamson
published
3.88
Kissie Stroup
published
3.80
Erin Huffines
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.75
Mimi Cartee
published
3.71
Sara Strassell
published
3.70
Lynn Guglielmo
published
3.56
Teresa Cruz
published
3.52
Clarissa Tatum
published 3.5
3.50
Gina Goy
published
3.21
Linda Lowman
published
Nadia Gregory
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alison Crews + Lynn Guglielmo9457% games+3.5% vs expected
Linda Lowman + Lynn Guglielmo3248% games−1.2% vs expected
Aundrea Hendley + Kissie Stroup6259% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Helms
20W–12L career · no lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
4.08
4
Alison Crews
113W–61L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
4.04
4.5
Aundrea Hendley
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
3.97
Kristin Williamson
40W–35L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.91
Kissie Stroup
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
3.88
Erin Huffines
173W–129L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
Mimi Cartee
16W–16L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Sara Strassell
25W–13L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Lynn Guglielmo
20W–13L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
Teresa Cruz
27W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.56
3.5
Clarissa Tatum
59W–24L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.52
Gina Goy
33W–35L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
Linda Lowman
43W–44L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Nadia Gregory
13W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.