Teams

FTA18C/HollyTree/Pixley

FTA COMBO 18 & OVER FTA Nights · 8.5 Women - Sunday

16 players · average NTRP 4.38 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-14vs FTA18C/Kroc/LaMunionWon 30
W#1 DoublesDanielle Morelli / Katie Tiller vs Karolina Valterova / Angeline Scheinbaum6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEmma Pixley / Abbie Foster vs Victoria Go / Carson Pellegrino6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDanielle Beckerle / Robyn Yarborough vs Megan Taylor / Demetra Karras7-5, 6-2
2025-09-07vs FTA18C/AcacSportsclub/ClaussenWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmma Pixley / Cali Rusk vs Julianne Foster / Danielle Claussen7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDanielle Morelli / Katie Tiller vs Brenna Feirer / Kimberly Parker6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBritton Groblewski / Maren Mueller vs Alexandra Dawson / Holly Tant7-6, 6-3
2025-08-17vs FTA18C/Kroc/LaMunionWon 30
W#1 DoublesKatie Tiller / Natalie Bieber vs Victoria Go / Carson Pellegrino6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMaren Mueller / Jessica Vest vs Stacey Twehues / Angeline Scheinbaum6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLynn Watson / Michelle Sykes vs Debbie Watson / Christina Engel6-4, 6-4
2025-08-10vs FTA18C/AcacSportsclub/ClaussenWon 30
W#1 DoublesDanielle Beckerle / Katie Tiller vs Brooke Walter / Holly Tant3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEmma Pixley / Abbie Foster vs Julianne Foster / Denise Jacques6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSara Hudgens / Amy Austin vs Brenna Feirer / Danielle Claussen7-6, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women - Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Britton Groblewski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.69
Jessica Vest
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.45
Emma Pixley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.37
Sara Hudgens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ali Marks
published 4.5
4.04
Danielle Beckerle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.01
Robyn Yarborough
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Katie Tiller
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.90
Amy Austin
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.85
Natalie Bieber
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.84
Cali Rusk
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
Danielle Morelli
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.75
Michelle Sykes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
Abbie Foster
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.64
Maren Mueller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.52
Lynn Watson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Sykes + Danielle Beckerle5157% games+16.4% vs expected
Emma Pixley + Cali Rusk3251% games+5.1% vs expected
Michelle Sykes + Amy Austin224 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Sykes + Cali Rusk404 matchesnot enough data
Amy Austin + Abbie Foster314 matchesnot enough data
Robyn Yarborough + Danielle Beckerle123 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Vest + Emma Pixley123 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Sykes + Abbie Foster213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Britton Groblewski
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jessica Vest
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
8%92%1%
4.69
5
Emma Pixley
18W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
4.45
Sara Hudgens
16W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%84%16%
4.37
4.5
Ali Marks
3W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Danielle Beckerle
29W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
4.04
Robyn Yarborough
3W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
48%52%<1%
4.01
Katie Tiller
12W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.90
4
Amy Austin
40W–32L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.90
Natalie Bieber
39W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Cali Rusk
24W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Danielle Morelli
31W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Michelle Sykes
54W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Abbie Foster
29W–22L career · 7 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
Maren Mueller
28W–8L career · 8 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.64
Lynn Watson
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.