Teams

Boulevard - Croom

2024 IRMSL Adult 18 & Over Spring · 3.5 SPRING Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.36 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-07-03vs IRMSL/Palmer/18&Over3.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesCynthia Croom / Nancy Barry vs Elizabeth Froehling / Jodi Koronich7-6, 6-3
2024-06-12vs Quail - Garcia/MarengoWon 10
W#1 DoublesDebbie Caldwell / Cynthia Croom vs Sara Lloyd / Tara Ramsey6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-05-29vs Sailfish Point - FrazierLost 01
L#2 DoublesCynthia Croom / Elizabeth Keenan vs Leigh Pisani / Pegi Kane2-6, 2-6
2024-05-22vs Quail - Garcia/MarengoWon 10
W#3 DoublesPatty Grady / Cynthia Croom vs Jennifer Malone Watson / Julia Durham6-3, 6-4
2024-05-15vs IRMSL/Palmer/18&Over3.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesCynthia Croom / Debbie Caldwell vs Jodi Koronich / Alexandra Chauss6-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 SPRING Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
3.32
Catherine Spahr
published 3.5
3.31
Cynthia Croom
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.30
Melissa Dean
published
Carol Emmons Finch
published 3.5
3.18
Nancy Barry
published
3.16
Patty Grady
published
3.12
Gail Embt
published 3.5
3.10
Pia Gold
published
3.00
Janel Griffin
published
2.94
Beth Kalish
published 3
2.88
Joan Dobravsky
published
2.58
Eileen Grossfeld
published 3
Marie Woodhull
published
Sue Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Barry + Melissa Dean5067% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl von Zielinski + Catherine Spahr303 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Dean + Gail Embt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cheryl von Zielinski
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
3.43
3.5
Catherine Spahr
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Cynthia Croom
54W–45L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%92%8%
3.31
Melissa Dean
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Carol Emmons Finch
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Barry
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
Patty Grady
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Gail Embt
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.12
Pia Gold
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.10
Janel Griffin
11W–18L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.00
3
Beth Kalish
18W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
2.94
Joan Dobravsky
8W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Eileen Grossfeld
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.58
Marie Woodhull
1W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sue Davis
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.