Teams

Youzhny 9.0

USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - BOISE · TV

12 players · average NTRP 4.25 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-04-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesVanessa Almaraz / Jim Martin vs Dan Buckingham / Dawna Buckingham6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-03-28Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJim Martin / Terry Hardy vs Brian Rice / Oleksandra Ivanova0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-03-27vs Social TennisingSplit 11
L#2 DoublesPratap Murali / Erin Peterson vs Mark Graham / Kerri Porritt3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJim Martin / Vanessa Almaraz vs Brett Keys / Paula Lawson7-6, 6-1
2021-03-21vs RacketeersWon 10
W#3 DoublesJim Martin / Vanessa Almaraz vs Jeff Buckingham / Gina Sharp6-4, 6-2
2021-03-20vs Pocket AcesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJim Martin / Vanessa Almaraz vs Trever Browne / Rebecca Newby4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrad Hines / Erin Peterson vs Greg Ferney / Rachel Kincheloe2-6, 3-6
2021-03-14vs RacketeersWon 10
W#2 DoublesJim Martin / Donna Polk vs Mike Buckingham / Rilee Moorhead6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-03-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesJim Martin / Vanessa Almaraz vs Jemre Okoh / Dana Rosellini6-2, 7-5
2021-03-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesVanessa Almaraz / Jim Martin vs Rebecca Newby / Rick Roby6-4, 6-2
2021-03-06vs Social TennisingWon 10
W#3 DoublesJim Martin / Vanessa Almaraz vs Jody Mallane / Sam Elsethagen7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Youzhny 9.063151231275
2Social Tennising2791841299

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.59
Alex Wong
published 4.5
4.38
Chad Vaughn
published 4.5
4.17
Pratap Murali
published 4.5
4.12
Emily Tesnohlidek
published 4.5
4.05
Vanessa Almaraz
published 4.5
3.87
Suzanna Murali
published 4
3.80
Jayme Sullivan
published 4
Donna Polk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Erin Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.43
Terry Hardy
published 4
Brad Hines
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Jim Martin
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanna Murali + Pratap Murali161849% games−3.4% vs expected
Vanessa Almaraz + Jim Martin14060% gamesnot enough data
Chad Vaughn + Suzanna Murali7653% gamesnot enough data
Brad Hines + Vanessa Almaraz21041% gamesnot enough data
Suzanna Murali + Alex Wong6551% gamesnot enough data
Chad Vaughn + Donna Polk6050% gamesnot enough data
Brad Hines + Emily Tesnohlidek2448% gamesnot enough data
Brad Hines + Donna Polk4252% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alex Wong
219W–70L career · no lines in 2021
<1%24%76%
4.59
4.5
Chad Vaughn
65W–29L career · type S · no lines in 2021
<1%81%18%
4.38
4.5
Pratap Murali
99W–69L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Emily Tesnohlidek
79W–79L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
4.12
4.5
Vanessa Almaraz
106W–105L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Suzanna Murali
297W–165L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Jayme Sullivan
49W–57L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Donna Polk
35W–38L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Erin Peterson
48W–47L career · type M · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Terry Hardy
212W–302L career · no lines in 2021
69%31%<1%
3.43
Brad Hines
36W–38L career · 10 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jim Martin
19W–3L career · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.