Teams

Racketeers

USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - BOISE · TV

14 players · average NTRP 4.23 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-03-27Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJeff Buckingham / Rilee Moorhead vs Tyler Neill / Erin Perry3-6, 4-6
2021-03-21Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJeff Buckingham / Gina Sharp vs Jim Martin / Vanessa Almaraz4-6, 2-6
2021-03-14vs Pocket AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeff Buckingham / Rilee Moorhead vs Anthony Hunt / Kathy Adamson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-03-14Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMike Buckingham / Rilee Moorhead vs Jim Martin / Donna Polk6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-03-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMike Buckingham / Rilee Moorhead vs Paula Lawson / Jemre Okoh5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.88
Dan Buckingham
published 5
4.53
Rilee Moorhead
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.47
Kathy Brashear
published 4.5
Gina Sharp
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.18
Tim Trued
published 4.5
4.11
Mike Buckingham
published 4
Bill Sharp
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.71
Dawna Buckingham
published 4
3.63
Maryann Moorhead
published 4
3.62
Colleen Schoeck
published 4
3.37
Russell Moorhead
published 3.5
Jeff Buckingham
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Harvey
published 0
Sandy Vo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Buckingham + Maryann Moorhead81047% games+7.4% vs expected
Rilee Moorhead + Dan Buckingham9360% games+4.5% vs expected
Maryann Moorhead + Dan Buckingham21656% games+2.9% vs expected
Dawna Buckingham + Dan Buckingham15955% games+2.5% vs expected
Russell Moorhead + Rilee Moorhead2747% games+1.2% vs expected
Maryann Moorhead + Russell Moorhead14952% games−2.9% vs expected
Mike Buckingham + Rilee Moorhead5945% games−3.7% vs expected
Rilee Moorhead + Jeff Buckingham282253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Dan Buckingham
128W–54L career · no lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
4.88
4.5
Rilee Moorhead
74W–34L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%42%58%
4.53
4.5
Kathy Brashear
172W–68L career · no lines in 2021
<1%60%40%
4.47
4.5
Gina Sharp
79W–63L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Tim Trued
100W–56L career · type D · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
4.18
4
Mike Buckingham
137W–88L career · no lines in 2021
<1%20%80%
4.11
4
Bill Sharp
53W–62L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Dawna Buckingham
94W–65L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Maryann Moorhead
149W–107L career · no lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
3.63
4
Colleen Schoeck
125W–67L career · no lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Russell Moorhead
110W–102L career · type A · no lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
3.37
Jeff Buckingham
50W–61L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
0
Michael Harvey
216W–85L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sandy Vo
53W–22L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.