Teams

Team 5 RBGCC 3.0

2024 NOVA Adult 18 & Over · NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-20vs Team 4 Backhand BanditsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMel Wesley / Emil Valle vs Sameer Farah / Keith Wojciech6-0, 6-4
2024-05-13vs Team 9 Tennis GangWon 10
W#2 SinglesMel Wesley vs Benoit Kroely6-3, 4-5
2024-05-06vs Team 2 WHO IS WE?Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMel Wesley / Mario Levine vs Eric Grace / SHANE MURRAY2-6, 5-6
L#2 DoublesEmil Valle / James Colucci vs Ali Montilla / Gautam Puranam2-6, 2-6
2024-04-29vs Team 3 Unstrung HeroesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMel Wesley / Peter Clyne vs Kevin Conaway / Mikhail Velasco2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Oakes / Emil Valle vs Craig Pickering / Majed Hamawy7-5, 6-2
2024-04-22Won 10
W#1 SinglesMel Wesley vs Kurt Castro6-4, 5-5
2024-04-15vs Team 1 Ageless All StarsWon 10
W#1 SinglesMel Wesley vs Matthew Plishker6-3, 5-3
2024-04-08vs Team 8 Serve AcesSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJack Barufka / Emil Valle vs Eric Hopkins / Samuel Meadema2-6, 7-6
W#2 SinglesMel Wesley vs Galip Karabulut7-5, 2-2
2024-04-01Won 20
W#1 DoublesPeter Clyne / Emil Valle vs Jonathan Cantalino / Max Luu6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMel Wesley vs Luis Sepulveda6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Sohale Razmjou
published
3.26
Mel Wesley
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 28% · published 3.5
3.18
Mario Levine
published
2.81
James Colucci
published
2.77
Emil Valle
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3
2.73
Jie Shi
published
John DeMoors
published
Kishan Modali
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emil Valle + Mel Wesley9459% gamesnot enough data
Mel Wesley + Mario Levine033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sohale Razmjou
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Mel Wesley
145W–106L career · 17 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
Mario Levine
7W–15L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
James Colucci
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
91%9%<1%
2.81
3
Emil Valle
52W–85L career · 13 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Allen Amir Parvizian
23W–23L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Jie Shi
0W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
John DeMoors
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kishan Modali
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.