Teams

Team 8 Serve Aces

2024 NOVA Adult 18 & Over · NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.10 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-18Won 10
W#1 SinglesTim Bowes vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-08vs Team 2 WHO IS WE?Split 11
L#1 SinglesJamie Holloman vs Ali Montilla6-7, 1-1
W#2 DoublesKEVIN CUMMINGS / Tim Bowes vs Yuanshu Wang / Damien Le6-4, 6-2
2024-05-26vs Team 7 CourtmastersWon 10
W#1 DoublesDouglas Thede / Jamie Holloman vs Michele Tavani / Kurt Castro6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-05-19vs Team 9 Tennis GangLost 01
L#2 SinglesTim Bowes vs Benoit Kroely2-6, 0-6
2024-05-11Lost 01
L#1 SinglesTim Bowes vs Jonathan Cantalino3-6, 4-3
2024-04-20vs Team 4 Backhand BanditsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKEVIN CUMMINGS / Jamie Holloman vs Pete Bianchini / Luan Nguyen6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesTim Bowes vs Juan Martinez Guzman4-6, 4-5
2024-04-14vs Team 3 Unstrung HeroesWon 10
W#1 DoublesTim Bowes / John Murray vs Craig Clayton / Kurt Schinnerer6-3, 6-0
2024-04-08vs Team 5 RBGCC 3.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesKEVIN CUMMINGS / Tim Bowes vs John DeMoors / James Colucci6-4, 3-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Jamie Holloman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Eric Hopkins
published 3.5
3.21
Douglas Thede
published
3.10
Galip Karabulut
published
2.75
Tim Bowes
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.71
Rich Vinnacombe
published
2.69
Jim Craig
published
2.67
Andrew Dotson
published 3
2.63
Paul Juergensen
published
2.62
Patrick Gardner
published
2.60
Samuel Meadema
published
2.60
KEVIN CUMMINGS
published
2.09
Christopher Wulff
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Hopkins + Jamie Holloman4165% games+9.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jamie Holloman
62W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Eric Hopkins
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.36
Douglas Thede
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Galip Karabulut
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Tim Bowes
34W–35L career · 6 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
Rich Vinnacombe
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.71
Jim Craig
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Andrew Dotson
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
Paul Juergensen
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
2.63
Patrick Gardner
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
2.62
Samuel Meadema
0W–7L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
2.60
KEVIN CUMMINGS
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
2.60
2.5
Christopher Wulff
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.