Teams

Team 9 Tennis Gang

2024 NOVA Adult 18 & Over · NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-15vs Team 2 WHO IS WE?Won 20
W#2 DoublesBenoit Kroely / Rick Liang vs Yuanshu Wang / Hanlun Song6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKevin Lee / Hongyangyang Shi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-08vs Team 7 CourtmastersWon 20
W#1 SinglesRick Liang vs Michele Tavani6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesBenoit Kroely vs Quan Vu6-1, 6-2
2024-05-19vs Team 8 Serve AcesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRick Liang / Ashwin Assysh Sharma vs John Murray / Douglas Thede0-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesBenoit Kroely vs Tim Bowes6-2, 6-0
2024-05-13vs Team 5 RBGCC 3.0Split 11
W#2 DoublesRick Liang / Hongyangyang Shi vs James Colucci / Allen Amir Parvizian2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesBenoit Kroely vs Mel Wesley3-6, 5-4
2024-05-07vs Team 4 Backhand BanditsWon 21
L#1 DoublesRick Liang / Han Dong vs Sameer Farah / Matthew Trimboli4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesBenoit Kroely vs Adnan Karimi6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKevin Lee / Hongyangyang Shi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-01vs Team 1 Ageless All StarsWon 30
W#1 DoublesRick Liang / Sean Yang vs Chandler Fox / Mark Jenkins6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesBenoit Kroely vs Matthew Plishker6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesHongyangyang Shi vs Prateek Mehra6-1, 7-5
2024-04-21vs Team 3 Unstrung HeroesWon 10
W#2 SinglesBenoit Kroely vs Rob Wright6-2, 6-1
2024-04-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesSean Yang / Hongyangyang Shi vs Geoff Burke / Greg Wright6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Jie Wang
published
3.29
Hongyangyang Shi
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.28
Benoit Kroely
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
3.15
Rick Liang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Sean Yang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hongyangyang Shi + Rick Liang314 matchesnot enough data
Rick Liang + Benoit Kroely404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jie Wang
13W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Hongyangyang Shi
38W–15L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3
Benoit Kroely
96W–41L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%2%98%
3.28
3.5
Rick Liang
137W–59L career · 6 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.15
Sean Yang
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.