Teams

Team 12 WGCC Slice Girls

2024 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Summer · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-22Won 10
W#1 SinglesKerri Thomas vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-21vs Team 7 Westwood WolfpackWon 10
W#1 SinglesKerri Thomas vs Katherine Virkstis6-1, 6-4
2024-07-08vs Team 11 Smash and DashLost 01
L#1 DoublesAngela Neeb / Kerri Thomas vs Kim Mullin / Kelly Kennedy4-6, 1-4
2024-07-01vs Team 13 Causing a RacquetWon 10
W#1 SinglesKerri Thomas vs Rosy Mcgillan6-1, 6-2
2024-06-10vs Team 9 Loosely StrungWon 10
W#1 SinglesKerri Thomas vs Sandy Lucidi6-1, 6-2
2024-06-03vs Team 4 Slice GirlsWon 10
W#1 SinglesKerri Thomas vs Linda Thierauf7-5, 5-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Kerri Thomas
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.16
Libbie Feldner
published
3.06
Michelle Bon Salle
published
3.02
Angela Neeb
published 3
2.93
Stacey Bowlin
published
2.86
Greta Kohlhagen
published
2.83
Maureen Petron
published
Cristin Finkel
published 3
2.66
Erin Parker
published
2.64
Taryn Walpole
published
Lindsay Egge
published
Susie Luongo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Parker + Maureen Petron213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kerri Thomas
98W–30L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.61
Libbie Feldner
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Michelle Bon Salle
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Angela Neeb
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.02
Stacey Bowlin
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
Greta Kohlhagen
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
2.86
Maureen Petron
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Cristin Finkel
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Erin Parker
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66
Taryn Walpole
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
2.64
Lindsay Egge
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susie Luongo
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.