Teams

Team 11 Smash and Dash

2024 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Summer · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-24vs Team 8 Haven AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesPauline Tsai / Kim Mullin vs Alison Weiss / Anna McLean3-6, 4-6
2024-07-19vs Team 3 Love & DeucesLost 01
L#3 DoublesPooja Singh / Pauline Tsai vs Jenny Oum / Cheryl Arnold5-7, 5-4
2024-07-14vs Team 7 Westwood WolfpackWon 10
W#3 DoublesPooja Singh / Kimberly Pedersen vs Gayle Balba / Erin Fisher6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-07-08vs Team 12 WGCC Slice GirlsLost 01
L#3 DoublesKimberly Pedersen / Sandee Addison vs Erin Parker / Maureen Petron3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-06-30vs Team 5 Deuces WildWon 21
W#1 DoublesKim Mullin / Pauline Tsai vs Tracye Duffin / Adriana Lee6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKimberly Pedersen vs Ayako Doi7-6, 1-2
W#3 DoublesMichele Brookhart / Pooja Singh vs Heather Hall / Meaghan Callahan6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2024-06-23vs Team 14 LothliamWon 10
W#2 DoublesLarissa Kochetkova / Michele Brookhart vs Julia Maggiano / Stacey Tuneski6-1, 6-0
2024-06-04vs Team 9 Loosely StrungLost 01
L#1 DoublesPauline Tsai / Larissa Kochetkova vs Kimberly McPhee / Deborah Williams6-4, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Kelly Kennedy
published
3.00
Pauline Tsai
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
Stephanie Fultz
published
2.82
Kim Mullin
published
2.81
Sailata Katragadda
published
2.68
Kimberly Pedersen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.64
Michele Brookhart
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.58
Sharon Dietz
published
2.53
Pooja Singh
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Kennedy
71W–35L career · no lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.03
3
Pauline Tsai
29W–24L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.00
Stephanie Fultz
12W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.88
Kim Mullin
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
Sailata Katragadda
35W–53L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Kimberly Pedersen
51W–76L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Michele Brookhart
27W–38L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
2.64
Sharon Dietz
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
2.58
Pooja Singh
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
2.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.