Teams

WP YELLOW

2022 TRIO - DEN · MEN 3.0 - TRIO

6 players · average NTRP 3.30 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-04-09vs TTA REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesNdudi Oparaeche / Talwin Filholm vs Jay Bat-Itgel / Sam Bailey6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJarrid DeMaio vs Andy Floyd1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Merman / Mark Anderson vs Paul Swanson / Adam Ager6-1, 7-6
2022-04-02vs NJ REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesJarrid DeMaio / Mark Anderson vs Rick Bonczynski / Gary Bland6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesWade Westphal vs Tyler Roberts3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTalwin Filholm / Jeffrey Merman vs Sebastian Siethoff / Ernest Reece6-4, 6-2
2022-03-26vs CM ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesNdudi Oparaeche / Talwin Filholm vs Jack Tighe / Joseph Mullen6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJarrid DeMaio / Jeffrey Merman vs Nils Holum / Dave Colodny6-4, 7-5
2022-03-19vs TTA REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Merman / Wade Westphal vs Andy Floyd / Paul Swanson6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesNdudi Oparaeche / Alan Beugg vs Rodney Gill / Sam Bailey6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Talwin Filholm
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Alan Beugg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Jeffrey Merman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Wade Westphal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.02
Jarrid DeMaio
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Ndudi Oparaeche
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey Merman + Talwin Filholm15070% games+13.0% vs expected
Jeffrey Merman + Jarrid DeMaio4455% games+4.0% vs expected
Ndudi Oparaeche + Talwin Filholm5556% games+2.3% vs expected
Ndudi Oparaeche + Jeffrey Merman7552% games−1.4% vs expected
Jeffrey Merman + Wade Westphal404 matchesnot enough data
Ndudi Oparaeche + Jarrid DeMaio213 matchesnot enough data
Ndudi Oparaeche + Alan Beugg303 matchesnot enough data
Ndudi Oparaeche + Wade Westphal303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Talwin Filholm
125W–69L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Alan Beugg
16W–4L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Jeffrey Merman
136W–81L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Wade Westphal
31W–24L career · 2 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.06
3
Jarrid DeMaio
98W–29L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Ndudi Oparaeche
97W–68L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.