Teams

TTA RED

2022 TRIO - DEN · MEN 3.0 - TRIO

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-04-09vs WP YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesJay Bat-Itgel / Sam Bailey vs Ndudi Oparaeche / Talwin Filholm3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAndy Floyd vs Jarrid DeMaio1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPaul Swanson / Adam Ager vs Jeffrey Merman / Mark Anderson1-6, 6-7
2022-04-02vs CM ORANGELost 12
W#1 DoublesAndy Floyd / Adam Ager vs Joseph Mullen / Steve Gonzales4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJay Bat-Itgel vs Dave Colodny4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPaul Swanson / Sam Bailey vs Jack Tighe / Paul Tighe4-6, 3-6
2022-03-26vs NJ REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesAdam Ager / Andy Floyd vs Rick Bonczynski / Gary Bland3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJay Bat-Itgel vs Ernest Reece6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSam Bailey / Rodney Gill vs Michael Schirmacher / Steve Young3-6, 1-6
2022-03-19vs WP YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndy Floyd / Paul Swanson vs Jeffrey Merman / Wade Westphal2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesJay Bat-Itgel vs Mark Anderson6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRodney Gill / Sam Bailey vs Ndudi Oparaeche / Alan Beugg2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Andy Floyd
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.77
Jay Bat-Itgel
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.45
Paul Swanson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Adam Ager
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rodney Gill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sam Bailey
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rodney Gill + Paul Swanson2445% gamesnot enough data
Rodney Gill + Sam Bailey1432% gamesnot enough data
Paul Swanson + Sam Bailey033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andy Floyd
20W–22L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.16
Jay Bat-Itgel
41W–54L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
Paul Swanson
5W–46L career · 3 lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.45
Adam Ager
5W–2L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rodney Gill
15W–64L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sam Bailey
1W–8L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.