Teams

NJ RED

2022 TRIO - DEN · MEN 3.0 - TRIO

7 players · average NTRP 3.08 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-04-09vs CM ORANGELost 12
L#1 DoublesRick Bonczynski / Ernest Reece vs Joseph Mullen / Nils Holum6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJeremy Wilder vs Dave Colodny4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesTyler Roberts / Gary Bland vs David Milliken / Jack Tighe6-2, 6-2
2022-04-02vs WP YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesRick Bonczynski / Gary Bland vs Jarrid DeMaio / Mark Anderson3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesTyler Roberts vs Wade Westphal6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSebastian Siethoff / Ernest Reece vs Talwin Filholm / Jeffrey Merman4-6, 2-6
2022-03-26vs TTA REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesRick Bonczynski / Gary Bland vs Adam Ager / Andy Floyd6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesErnest Reece vs Jay Bat-Itgel0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Schirmacher / Steve Young vs Sam Bailey / Rodney Gill6-3, 6-1
2022-03-19vs CM ORANGEWon 30
W#1 DoublesJeremy Wilder / Sebastian Siethoff vs Joseph Mullen / Mark Fulford6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMichael Schirmacher vs Chad Olson6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTyler Roberts / Steve Young vs Jack Tighe / Nils Holum6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Tyler Roberts
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Gary Bland
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.04
Michael Schirmacher
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.00
Ernest Reece
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Jeremy Wilder
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.81
Rick Bonczynski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Sebastian Siethoff
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rick Bonczynski + Jeremy Wilder6355% games+14.7% vs expected
Jeremy Wilder + Tyler Roberts17269% games+12.4% vs expected
Rick Bonczynski + Gary Bland7459% games+1.3% vs expected
Jeremy Wilder + Gary Bland123 matchesnot enough data
Sebastian Siethoff + Ernest Reece213 matchesnot enough data
Ernest Reece + Gary Bland303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tyler Roberts
81W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
3.48
3
Gary Bland
103W–75L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Michael Schirmacher
52W–40L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Ernest Reece
74W–37L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Jeremy Wilder
147W–85L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Rick Bonczynski
129W–124L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
2.81
Sebastian Siethoff
20W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.