Teams

YMCA PRESIDIO 40MX7.0A

2025 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX7.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-28vs GOLDEN GATE TC/GOLDMAN TC 40MX7.0CLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Tang / Amy Niles vs Serene Lai / David Tse4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBart Schachter / Elizabeth Coryell vs Jing Liu / Simon Kwan3-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesAshley Hellyer / Lawrence Henriquez vs Peter Li / Maggie Ho7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Linda Geballe
published
3.72
Natalie Batlin
published
3.53
Lawrence Henriquez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
John Pinto
published
3.32
Trevor Wade
published
Amy Niles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Bart Schachter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Ashley Hellyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Joanna Brook
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Amy Peinado
published 3.5
3.10
Barbara Ignatius
published 3.5
3.06
Molly Shiels
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Joseph Tucker
published
2.98
Sarah Howard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Elizabeth Coryell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Phillip Seto
published
Sanjiv Kalevar
published
Zoe Slocum
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Pinto + Molly Shiels123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Geballe
50W–24L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Natalie Batlin
20W–20L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Lawrence Henriquez
19W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
John Pinto
15W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
Trevor Wade
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Amy Niles
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Bart Schachter
0W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Ashley Hellyer
20W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Joanna Brook
14W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Amy Peinado
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Barbara Ignatius
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.10
Molly Shiels
13W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
Joseph Tucker
4W–13L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
Sarah Howard
6W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.98
Elizabeth Coryell
1W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.95
Phillip Seto
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sanjiv Kalevar
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Zoe Slocum
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.