Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Young/Swensen

2023 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 4.0W AM

17 players · average NTRP 3.96 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-06-01vs Sports Mall-SimmonsGillespieWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Fotheringham / Julie Cooley vs Jackie Parker / Jennifer Rasmussen6-0, 6-1
2023-05-18vs Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/HronekLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristine Fotheringham / Julie Cooley vs Mandy Berg / Rosa McGuire3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2023-05-04vs Park City MARC-Leigh/EpsteinLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Cooley / Christine Fotheringham vs Jennifer Johnson / Phoebe Hailey2-6, 5-7
2023-04-13vs Sports Mall-SimmonsGillespieWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Fotheringham / Julie Cooley vs Jackie Parker / Merri Gillespie6-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Christine Fotheringham
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
3.95
Alisa Gardner
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.95
Julie Cooley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Anne Young
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
Dalynn Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.74
Amy Earl
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 4
3.74
Kim Cronin
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 41% · published 4
3.69
Chandi Hurd
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 4
3.65
Deanne Goaslind
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.65
Emily Benton
usually #2 Doubles 27%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
3.65
Mindy Dunyon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.62
Annette Knight
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.53
Katie Swensen
published
3.46
Jessica Gardner
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
3.36
Gretel Sampson
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Alena Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Natalie Clawson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Swensen + Christine Fotheringham6080% games+16.7% vs expected
Annette Knight + Emily Benton4264% games+14.7% vs expected
Gretel Sampson + Alisa Gardner11366% games+14.4% vs expected
Amy Earl + Kim Cronin4262% games+13.1% vs expected
Kim Cronin + Alisa Gardner14068% games+10.9% vs expected
Jessica Gardner + Alisa Gardner8160% games+10.6% vs expected
Alisa Gardner + Christine Fotheringham14562% games+10.0% vs expected
Emily Benton + Alisa Gardner11266% games+9.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christine Fotheringham
213W–62L career · 7 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
4.11
4
Alisa Gardner
197W–48L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.95
Julie Cooley
61W–23L career · 4 lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
3.95
4
Anne Young
17W–33L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Dalynn Thomas
79W–69L career · 10 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Amy Earl
111W–45L career · 7 lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.74
4
Kim Cronin
380W–237L career · 27 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Chandi Hurd
180W–143L career · 14 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Deanne Goaslind
62W–60L career · 8 lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
Emily Benton
150W–123L career · 9 lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Mindy Dunyon
121W–85L career · 8 lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Annette Knight
58W–66L career · 10 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.62
Katie Swensen
102W–84L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.53
Jessica Gardner
83W–72L career · 11 lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Gretel Sampson
200W–198L career · 17 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Alena Taylor
178W–200L career · 12 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Natalie Clawson
42W–26L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.