Teams

NC:Bad Aces:Havens

2022 SCT Adult 18 & Over Women Summer · 4.0 Women - 2

19 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-07-23vs TRC:No Love Loss:BroderickSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDeborah Salomon / Nanci Kirshner vs Sue Broderick / Marykate Root3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesWendy Laychak vs Suzanne Crowe6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMiley Peake / Pilar Estrada vs Salam Turki / Claudia Lacasia7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Weitz / Amy Silberfein vs Liza Wong / Rosemary Klein6-4, 7-5
L#1 DoublesDeborah Salomon / Nanci Kirshner vs Anna Blome / Deb Parnes6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJennifer Weitz vs Meredith Earley6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPilar Estrada / Amanda Bryan vs Sharon Casey / Kelly Genova6-1, 6-2
2022-07-09vs NC:Super Deuces/SS:IsazaWon 31
W#1 DoublesDeborah Salomon / Nanci Kirshner vs Michele Halem / Tracey Langlois6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesWendy Laychak vs Julia Mitchell6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCindy Havens / Fatou Niang vs Maureen Ruckman / Nina Lota7-6, 5-2
L#3 DoublesJennifer Weitz / Amy Silberfein vs Kirsten Sweeney / Wendy Bennett4-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesDeborah Salomon / Nanci Kirshner vs Anna Blome / Jamie Coconis3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesWendy Laychak vs Meredith Earley6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesFatou Niang / Toni Sturm vs Deb Parnes / Melani Lust6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAmanda Bryan / Miley Peake vs Christina Scherwin / Monica Ryan7-5, 6-1
2022-06-18vs Q - MIT:Summer BB's:DeAngelisWon 31
W#1 DoublesTiffany Bevacqua / Nanci Kirshner vs Linda Dest / Pam Iannazzo7-5, 6-6
L#1 SinglesWendy Laychak vs Lieselotte Sippel2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesFatou Niang / Toni Sturm vs Bobbi Deangelis / Ann Garvey6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCindy Havens / Amy Tucci vs Aidyl Kareh / Catherine Cannella3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-06-12vs TRC:No Love Loss:BroderickWon 21
L#1 DoublesNanci Kirshner / Toni Sturm vs Claudia Lacasia / Marykate Root2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCindy Havens / Lisa Richardson vs Sue Broderick / Mary Zubrinsky4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMiley Peake / ADRIENNE FULK vs Karen Cushnie / Ellen O'Donnell6-4, 6-2
2022-06-01vs MIT:Casual Sets:PospisilSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDao Engle / ADRIENNE FULK vs Elizabeth Griffin / Kimberly Murray7-5, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJill Bakken vs Kimberly Nyklicek2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNanci Kirshner / Amy Silberfein vs Erzsebet Pusztai / Christina Marini2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAmy Tucci / Miley Peake vs Mary Kaump / Polly Edwards4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-24vs Q - MIT:Summer BB's:DeAngelisLost 13
L#1 DoublesToni Sturm / Nanci Kirshner vs Linda Dest / Jennifer Driscoll4-6, 6-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Weitz vs Lieselotte Sippel1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Tucci / Miley Peake vs Bobbi Deangelis / Susan Haven6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJill Bakken / Cindy Havens vs Jacquelyn Hutchison / Carol Lange6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-05-14vs MIT:Casual Sets:PospisilWon 40
W#1 DoublesDeborah Salomon / Nanci Kirshner vs Elizabeth Griffin / Mari Ullyett6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJennifer Weitz vs Kimberly Nyklicek2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCindy Havens / Tiffany Bevacqua vs Erzsebet Pusztai / Virginia Greatsinger7-6, 4-2
W#3 DoublesPilar Estrada / Miley Peake vs Milla Pospisil / Graziana Weill6-2, 7-6
2022-05-01vs NC:Super Deuces/SS:IsazaWon 40
W#1 DoublesNanci Kirshner / Toni Sturm vs Nina Lota / Michele Halem7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCindy Havens vs Tracey Langlois2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDao Engle / ADRIENNE FULK vs Colleen Campo / Meghan Keane6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTiffany Bevacqua / Pilar Estrada vs Maureen Ruckman / Virginia Schwartz7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women - 2 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Amanda Bryan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.81
Pilar Estrada
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Amy Silberfein
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Amy Tucci
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Dao Engle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Fatou Niang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Jennifer Weitz
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.68
ADRIENNE FULK
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Tiffany Bevacqua
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.65
Deborah Salomon
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.63
Cindy Havens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
Miley Peake
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
Nanci Kirshner
usually #1 Doubles 90%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published 4
3.21
Jennifer LaSusa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Malee Sparagna
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jill Bakken
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Lisa Richardson
published
Toni Sturm
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Wendy Laychak
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dao Engle + ADRIENNE FULK10458% games+9.3% vs expected
Amanda Bryan + Deborah Salomon2450% games+8.5% vs expected
Cindy Havens + Toni Sturm6555% games+6.9% vs expected
Miley Peake + Amy Tucci371259% games+4.2% vs expected
Toni Sturm + Deborah Salomon181153% games+4.0% vs expected
Amanda Bryan + Amy Tucci10951% games+1.7% vs expected
Nanci Kirshner + Deborah Salomon161853% games+0.6% vs expected
Nanci Kirshner + Toni Sturm11949% games+0.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda Bryan
141W–80L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
4.03
Pilar Estrada
64W–41L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Amy Silberfein
16W–48L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Amy Tucci
65W–34L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Dao Engle
38W–22L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Fatou Niang
15W–18L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer Weitz
97W–78L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
ADRIENNE FULK
63W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Tiffany Bevacqua
49W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.67
4
Deborah Salomon
77W–97L career · 8 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Cindy Havens
57W–38L career · 6 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.63
Miley Peake
59W–19L career · 6 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Nanci Kirshner
93W–105L career · 10 lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.53
Jennifer LaSusa
51W–45L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Malee Sparagna
67W–88L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
Jill Bakken
31W–65L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Richardson
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Toni Sturm
46W–32L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Wendy Laychak
17W–3L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.