Teams

TCT:Always Be Closing:Ryan/Scherwin

2022 SCT Adult 18 & Over Women Summer · 4.0 Women - 2

18 players · average NTRP 4.06 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-07-24vs NC:Super Deuces/SS:IsazaWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnna Blome / Meredith Earley vs Tracey Langlois / Maureen Ruckman6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJamie Coconis vs Lauren Morea6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChristina Scherwin / Sharon Casey vs Wendy Bennett / Cheryl Levine6-3, 6-4
2022-07-17vs NC:Bad Aces:HavensLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnna Blome / Deb Parnes vs Deborah Salomon / Nanci Kirshner1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMeredith Earley vs Jennifer Weitz4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Casey / Kelly Genova vs Pilar Estrada / Amanda Bryan1-6, 2-6
2022-07-10vs MIT:Casual Sets:PospisilLost 13
L#1 DoublesAnna Blome / Erin Harris vs Erzsebet Pusztai / Christina Marini2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKelly Genova vs Kimberly Nyklicek6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesChristina Scherwin / Lynn Siebert vs Mari Ullyett / Kristen Doyle7-6, 4-4
L#3 DoublesMonica Ryan / Hildi Todrin vs Judit Farkas / Kristin Daley0-6, 2-6
2022-06-25vs NC:Bad Aces:HavensLost 13
W#1 DoublesAnna Blome / Jamie Coconis vs Deborah Salomon / Nanci Kirshner6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMeredith Earley vs Wendy Laychak1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDeb Parnes / Melani Lust vs Fatou Niang / Toni Sturm1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Scherwin / Monica Ryan vs Amanda Bryan / Miley Peake5-7, 1-6
2022-06-19vs TRC:No Love Loss:BroderickSplit 22
L#1 DoublesChristina Scherwin / Erin Harris vs Sue Broderick / Marykate Root2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMeredith Earley vs Salam Turki4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Dellacroce / Melani Lust vs Claudia Lacasia / Joyce Somers3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSharon Casey / Anna Blome vs Hetal Kocinsky / Suzanne Crowe7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-11vs NC:Super Deuces/SS:IsazaSplit 22
W#1 DoublesChristina Scherwin / Anna Blome vs Wendy Bennett / Kirsten Sweeney6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesOona Robinson vs Lauren Morea6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMeredith Earley / Jamie Coconis vs Maureen Ruckman / Nina Lota6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMonica Ryan / Christiane Goldman vs Colleen Campo / Tracey Langlois1-6, 2-6
2022-05-31vs Q - MIT:Summer BB's:DeAngelisSplit 22
W#1 DoublesChristina Scherwin / Sharon Casey vs Pam Iannazzo / Nikki Pecknold6-0, 7-6
L#1 SinglesMeredith Earley vs Allison Umbricht5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDeb Parnes / Kelly Genova vs Nicole Gammino / Kira Lent3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Dellacroce / Hildi Todrin vs Aidyl Kareh / Julie Bastarache6-4, 7-5
2022-05-15vs Q - MIT:Summer BB's:DeAngelisWon 31
W#1 DoublesChristina Scherwin / Anna Blome vs Jennifer Driscoll / Pam Iannazzo6-0, 7-6
L#1 SinglesOona Robinson vs Jacquelyn Hutchison3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Genova / Deb Parnes vs Susan Haven / Aidyl Kareh2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Dellacroce / Meredith Earley vs Nicole Gammino / Catherine Cannella7-6, 6-4
2022-05-08vs TRC:No Love Loss:BroderickWon 31
W#1 DoublesAnna Blome / Erin Harris vs Claudia Lacasia / Joyce Somers6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesSharon Casey vs Liza Wong2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristina Scherwin / Monica Ryan vs Rosemary Klein / Hetal Kocinsky7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesOona Robinson / Hildi Todrin vs Jane Kim / Dorothy Spenner7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2022-05-01vs MIT:Casual Sets:PospisilSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAnna Blome / Erin Harris vs Milla Pospisil / Kirsten Page6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesChristina Scherwin vs Sheila Cimmino6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDeb Parnes / Kelly Genova vs Virginia Greatsinger / Lisa Arconti5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMonica Ryan / Shannon Craley vs Kristin Daley / Judit Farkas1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women - 2 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Pamela Jeppson
published 5
Anna Blome
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 4.5
4.09
Jamie Coconis
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.88
Erin Harris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Meredith Earley
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.60
Christina Scherwin
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Kelly Genova
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.56
Deb Parnes
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.53
Sharon Casey
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.46
Jennifer Dellacroce
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.43
Oona Robinson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Shannon Craley
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.05
Christiane Goldman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.90
Hildi Todrin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Lynn Siebert
published
Melani Lust
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Monica Ryan
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Stefanie Lemcke
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina Scherwin + Monica Ryan6846% games+3.9% vs expected
Jennifer Dellacroce + Christina Scherwin7847% games−3.9% vs expected
Melani Lust + Deb Parnes044 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Genova + Deb Parnes134 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Craley + Monica Ryan224 matchesnot enough data
Stefanie Lemcke + Christina Scherwin314 matchesnot enough data
Anna Blome + Erin Harris213 matchesnot enough data
Melani Lust + Jennifer Dellacroce303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Pamela Jeppson
155W–56L career · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
4.48
4.5
Anna Blome
19W–9L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Jamie Coconis
59W–37L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%24%76%
4.09
4
Erin Harris
222W–83L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.88
Meredith Earley
36W–33L career · 7 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.61
4
Christina Scherwin
130W–69L career · 9 lines in 2022
21%78%<1%
3.60
Kelly Genova
19W–28L career · 5 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Deb Parnes
119W–133L career · 5 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
Sharon Casey
109W–51L career · 5 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
Jennifer Dellacroce
79W–50L career · 8 lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
3.46
Oona Robinson
31W–47L career · 3 lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
3.43
Shannon Craley
98W–79L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Christiane Goldman
37W–30L career · 1 line in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
3.5
Hildi Todrin
104W–133L career · 3 lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
2.90
Lynn Siebert
36W–26L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Melani Lust
23W–33L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Monica Ryan
68W–77L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Stefanie Lemcke
32W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.