Teams

Cooper/Memphis

2025 Mixed 18 & Over - Memphis · 4.0 Mixed 18 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-06-15vs Alexander/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Magee / ROBERT LEBLANC vs Catie Carter / John Gleysteen0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesXuezhong Li / Sydney Trumbo vs Stephanie Dent / Oscar Carr6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKatie Ansel / Peyton Neal vs Virginia Burbank / Berkeley Burbank6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Xuezhong Li
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Griffin Lonardo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.80
David Kam
published 4
3.73
3.59
Savannah Nagle
published
3.56
Sydney Trumbo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Peyton Neal
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.50
ROBERT LEBLANC
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Katie Ansel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Kevin Roedel
published
3.32
Jennifer Carstensen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Melony Bratton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Juliet Wagner
published
Thomas Pickens
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melony Bratton + Kevin Roedel2348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Xuezhong Li
15W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Griffin Lonardo
59W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
David Kam
32W–32L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Gabriella Yarbrough
34W–25L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Savannah Nagle
18W–8L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.59
Sydney Trumbo
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.56
Peyton Neal
52W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
ROBERT LEBLANC
23W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Katie Ansel
44W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Kevin Roedel
52W–40L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
Jennifer Carstensen
61W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
Melony Bratton
91W–70L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
Juliet Wagner
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Pickens
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.