Teams

Causing a Racquet

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - BOISE · TV

22 players · average NTRP 3.29 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-07-07vs Grand Slam GalsWon 40
W#1 DoublesDaphne McNeal / Amy Boettcher vs Susan Keller / Jody Metcalf6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKristen Ewing / Danielle Krawl vs Caleigh Hines / Jennifer Boyd6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCarmal Chrisman vs Deena Emry6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBridget Henson / Heather Tabacco vs Sandra Healy / Mary-Katherine Ekins6-4, 6-1
2021-06-23vs Double ShotsWon 20
W#1 SinglesAmy Boettcher vs Sydney Lewis6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesCarmal Chrisman vs Katie Pelazini5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2021-06-15vs Grand Slam GalsLost 02
L#1 DoublesDaphne McNeal / Kristen Ewing vs Susan Keller / Jody Metcalf1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Boettcher vs Deena Emry3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-05-26vs Double ShotsWon 20
W#1 DoublesDaphne McNeal / Lael Sabala vs Suzanne Hickok / Erin Retelle7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarmal Chrisman / Hannah Young vs Heidi Linzbach / Nichole Caropino6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Maji Daines
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.67
Alexandra Hodson
published 4
3.32
Amy Boettcher
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Tannan Koehl
published
3.13
Farrell Kessler
published 3
3.11
Amy Costello
published 3.5
2.97
Amy Salerno
published 3.5
2.96
Daphne McNeal
published 3
2.94
Stacey Novak
published 3
2.89
Nikki Reynolds
published 3
2.89
Valencia Bilyeu
published 3
2.80
Hannah Young
published 3
Carmal Chrisman
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Danielle Krawl
published 3
2.66
Emily Beckmann
published 3
Bridget Henson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Heather Tabacco
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jordan Schuldheiss
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Kristen Ewing
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Lael Sabala
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Noonan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Stacey Kozakar
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexandra Hodson + Maji Daines25661% games+6.8% vs expected
Daphne McNeal + Valencia Bilyeu4549% games+6.2% vs expected
Daphne McNeal + Nikki Reynolds7167% games+5.1% vs expected
Nikki Reynolds + Farrell Kessler4546% games+1.5% vs expected
Emily Beckmann + Jordan Schuldheiss4847% gamesnot enough data
Tannan Koehl + Amy Costello8262% gamesnot enough data
Amy Boettcher + Daphne McNeal8273% gamesnot enough data
Kristen Ewing + Danielle Krawl6451% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Maji Daines
163W–74L career · 3 lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
4.09
4
Alexandra Hodson
155W–90L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Amy Boettcher
35W–32L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.32
Tannan Koehl
92W–61L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3
Farrell Kessler
106W–81L career · no lines in 2021
<1%16%84%
3.13
3.5
Amy Costello
148W–95L career · type A · no lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Amy Salerno
39W–42L career · no lines in 2021
59%41%<1%
2.97
3
Daphne McNeal
53W–40L career · no lines in 2021
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Stacey Novak
88W–110L career · no lines in 2021
<1%67%32%
2.94
3
Nikki Reynolds
74W–67L career · no lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Valencia Bilyeu
145W–124L career · no lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Hannah Young
36W–33L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Carmal Chrisman
26W–34L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Danielle Krawl
46W–67L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Emily Beckmann
62W–53L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
2.66
Bridget Henson
4W–19L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Heather Tabacco
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jordan Schuldheiss
7W–11L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kristen Ewing
11W–11L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lael Sabala
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Lauren Noonan
64W–53L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Stacey Kozakar
66W–86L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.