Teams

ACP.Lipkin

2025 CTRL Fall Singles 18 & Over · Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-11-20vs TING.NarayananLost 01
L#3 SinglesPenny Kraft vs Kace Martin6-7, 1-6
2025-11-13vs MD.WintersLost 02
L#1 SinglesAlicia Fitzpatrick vs Christine Reinke1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 SinglesPenny Kraft vs Stephanie Pavlick1-6, 1-6
2025-11-11vs LOCH.HoylesWon 10
W#1 SinglesAlicia Fitzpatrick vs Jennifer Locklear6-3, 6-4
2025-10-30vs TING.NarayananLost 01
L#1 SinglesMelinda Reinicker vs Jorie Devine-Lichty1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-10-23vs MD.WintersWon 20
W#1 SinglesMelinda Reinicker vs Amy Rogers3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesHeather Hastings vs Lindsay Winters7-5, 6-4
2025-10-16vs LOCH.HoylesWon 10
W#2 SinglesAlicia Fitzpatrick vs Michelle Hoyles6-0, 6-0
2025-10-09vs TING.NarayananWon 10
W#1 SinglesHeather Hastings vs Disha Narayanan6-4, 6-1
2025-10-08vs MD.WintersLost 01
L#1 SinglesMelinda Reinicker vs Allie Ligay4-6, 1-6
2025-09-25vs LOCH.HoylesLost 01
L#3 SinglesPenny Kraft vs Debra Combos3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Heather Hastings
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Alicia Fitzpatrick
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Priya Desai
published
3.22
Angela Newman
published 3.5
3.21
Melinda Reinicker
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Erika Lipkin
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 3
2.86
Emily Haverstick
published 3
2.82
Jamie Maness
usually #3 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
2.66
Penny Kraft
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erika Lipkin + Jamie Maness303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Heather Hastings
61W–69L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Alicia Fitzpatrick
104W–68L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Priya Desai
37W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.24
3.5
Angela Newman
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Melinda Reinicker
98W–59L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
3
Erika Lipkin
72W–83L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Emily Haverstick
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Jamie Maness
34W–29L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Penny Kraft
120W–327L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.