Teams

TING.Narayanan

2025 CTRL Fall Singles 18 & Over · Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-11-20vs ACP.LipkinWon 20
W#2 SinglesDanelle Alex vs Emily Haverstick6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesKace Martin vs Penny Kraft7-6, 6-1
2025-11-14vs MD.WintersLost 01
L#3 SinglesDisha Narayanan vs Stephanie Pavlick1-6, 3-6
2025-11-13vs LOCH.HoylesSplit 11
W#2 SinglesDanelle Alex vs Amy Gresko6-1, 6-2
L#3 SinglesRebecca Kotcher vs Michelle Hoyles4-6, 3-6
2025-10-30vs ACP.LipkinWon 20
W#2 SinglesDanelle Alex vs Erika Lipkin6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesSara Hyde vs Jamie Maness6-2, 6-1
2025-10-23vs LOCH.HoylesLost 12
L#1 SinglesSara Hyde vs Michelle Hoyles3-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesDisha Narayanan vs Debra Combos4-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesTaqiyya Yasin vs Julianne Cinoman6-2, 6-2
2025-10-16vs MD.WintersLost 01
L#2 SinglesRebecca Kotcher vs Cait Bauer2-6, 3-6
2025-10-15vs MD.WintersLost 01
L#3 SinglesDisha Narayanan vs Stephanie Pavlick1-6, 2-6
2025-10-09vs ACP.LipkinLost 03
L#1 SinglesDisha Narayanan vs Heather Hastings4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKace Martin vs Priya Desai6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesTaqiyya Yasin vs Erika Lipkin1-6, 3-6
2025-10-02vs LOCH.HoylesWon 21
L#1 SinglesDanelle Alex vs Michelle Hoyles2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKace Martin vs Jannette White6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesRebecca Kotcher vs Julianne Cinoman7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Danelle Alex
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 3
3.19
Taqiyya Yasin
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
3.19
Kace Martin
usually #2 Singles 83%, also #3 Singles 17% · published 3
3.17
Jorie Devine-Lichty
published
3.10
Sara Hyde
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.90
Rebecca Kotcher
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 30% · published 3
2.67
Disha Narayanan
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danelle Alex + Kace Martin20364% games+7.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Danelle Alex
104W–57L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.26
3
Taqiyya Yasin
149W–89L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
3
Kace Martin
73W–45L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
Jorie Devine-Lichty
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Sara Hyde
54W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.10
3
Rebecca Kotcher
46W–49L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
2.90
3
Disha Narayanan
30W–52L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.