Teams

LOCH.Hoyles

2025 CTRL Fall Singles 18 & Over · Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-13vs TING.NarayananLost 12
L#1 SinglesJennifer Locklear vs Jorie Devine-Lichty6-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAmy Gresko vs Danelle Alex1-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesMichelle Hoyles vs Rebecca Kotcher6-4, 6-3
2025-11-11vs ACP.LipkinLost 01
L#1 SinglesJennifer Locklear vs Alicia Fitzpatrick3-6, 4-6
2025-10-30vs MD.WintersLost 03
L#1 SinglesKristine Pelt vs Lindsay Winters1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAmy Gresko vs Meredith Kinkle4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesDebra Combos vs Karen Merchant4-6, 4-6
2025-10-23vs TING.NarayananWon 20
W#1 SinglesMichelle Hoyles vs Sara Hyde6-3, 7-6
W#2 SinglesDebra Combos vs Disha Narayanan6-4, 6-3
2025-10-20vs MD.WintersLost 02
L#1 SinglesAmy Gresko vs Allie Ligay1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJennifer Locklear vs Cait Bauer3-6, 6-7
2025-10-16vs ACP.LipkinLost 01
L#2 SinglesMichelle Hoyles vs Alicia Fitzpatrick0-6, 0-6
2025-10-02vs TING.NarayananWon 10
W#1 SinglesMichelle Hoyles vs Danelle Alex2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-09-25vs ACP.LipkinWon 30
W#1 SinglesJennifer Locklear vs Angela Newman6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKristine Pelt vs Emily Haverstick6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesDebra Combos vs Penny Kraft6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Jennifer Locklear
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Kristine Pelt
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Amy Gresko
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Michelle Hoyles
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.94
Sharon Poindexter
published
2.83
Debra Combos
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristine Pelt + Jennifer Locklear5162% games+9.4% vs expected
Michelle Hoyles + Kristine Pelt6847% games−0.5% vs expected
Debra Combos + Jennifer Locklear224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jennifer Locklear
97W–63L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Kristine Pelt
155W–108L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Amy Gresko
63W–51L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Michelle Hoyles
127W–127L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
Sharon Poindexter
1W–13L career · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.94
3
Debra Combos
81W–119L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.