Teams

ACP.Lipkin

2025 CTRL Fall Singles 18 & Over · Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2025-11-20vs TING.NarayananLost 01
L#1 SinglesJamie Maness vs Jorie Devine-Lichty2-6, 3-6
2025-11-18vs TOC.HumphreySplit 11
L#2 SinglesErin Horne vs Shanie Kpanay3-6, 5-7
W#3 SinglesJamie Maness vs Jolie LeBrun6-3, 6-4
2025-11-12vs BENT.WagnerWon 21
W#1 SinglesJamie Maness vs Stayce Key7-6, 6-3
L#2 SinglesErin Horne vs Rebecca Kotcher1-6, 5-7
W#3 SinglesErika Lipkin vs Megan Wagner2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-11-12vs TING.JohnsonLost 01
L#2 SinglesErika Lipkin vs Sabrina Hsin Hua Lee5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-11-11vs LOCH.HoylesLost 01
L#3 SinglesErika Lipkin vs Sharon Poindexter6-7, 2-6
2025-10-30vs TING.NarayananLost 02
L#2 SinglesErika Lipkin vs Danelle Alex2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesJamie Maness vs Sara Hyde2-6, 1-6
2025-10-23vs MD.WintersWon 10
W#3 SinglesErika Lipkin vs Shari McCandlish6-2, 6-2
2025-10-16vs LOCH.HoylesLost 01
L#3 SinglesJamie Maness vs Sharon Poindexter6-7, 5-7
2025-10-09vs TING.NarayananWon 10
W#3 SinglesErika Lipkin vs Taqiyya Yasin6-1, 6-3
2025-10-08vs MCP.CaiWon 20
W#1 SinglesErika Lipkin vs Yelizaveta Petrova6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesErin Horne vs McKenna Martin6-0, 6-1
2025-10-08Lost 01
L#3 SinglesJamie Maness vs Amy Rogers2-6, 2-6
2025-09-25Lost 01
L#2 SinglesJamie Maness vs Tara Navarro0-6, 4-6
2025-09-17vs ACP.KraftWon 10
W#2 SinglesErika Lipkin vs Stephanie Levin3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Priya Desai
published
3.19
Angela Newman
published 3.5
2.98
Erika Lipkin
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 3
2.91
Emily Haverstick
published
2.83
Jamie Maness
usually #3 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
2.72
Sarah Rodriguez
published
2.71
Erin Horne
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.70
Allison Lagstrom
published 3
2.65
Julie Wray
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erika Lipkin + Erin Horne213 matchesnot enough data
Erika Lipkin + Jamie Maness303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Priya Desai
36W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.27
3.5
Angela Newman
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Erika Lipkin
71W–82L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Emily Haverstick
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
2.91
3
Jamie Maness
34W–29L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Sarah Rodriguez
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.72
3
Erin Horne
55W–52L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Allison Lagstrom
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
Julie Wray
12W–19L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.