Teams

Stanley/Sherwood/BP

2023 Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Molly Murdock
published
3.43
Brooke Smith
published 4
3.38
JoeAnn Ashby
published
3.35
Carolyn Wells
published 3.5
3.31
Milli Stanley
published
3.29
Sarah Sisco
published
3.26
Margaret Hoskyn
published
Amy Lane
published 3.5
3.12
Katelyn Lazenby
published
3.02
Kara Bloomfield
published
2.99
Karen Shepherd
published
2.84
Jasmine Black
published
Jennifer Dartez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kara Bloomfield + Carolyn Wells7257% games+2.5% vs expected
Margaret Hoskyn + Milli Stanley1634% games−0.4% vs expected
JoeAnn Ashby + Kara Bloomfield4258% games−6.7% vs expected
Margaret Hoskyn + JoeAnn Ashby3263% gamesnot enough data
Milli Stanley + JoeAnn Ashby213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Molly Murdock
28W–19L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Brooke Smith
52W–22L career · no lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
3.43
JoeAnn Ashby
22W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Carolyn Wells
29W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.35
Milli Stanley
46W–51L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Sarah Sisco
32W–42L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.29
Margaret Hoskyn
41W–31L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Amy Lane
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katelyn Lazenby
14W–29L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.12
Kara Bloomfield
35W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.02
Karen Shepherd
60W–34L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Anna Catherine Cargile
19W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
2.84
Jasmine Black
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Dartez
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.