Teams

Vero Club Tennis - Southerly

2024 IRMSL Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.25 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-21vs Nrs/DeGaetanoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesStacy Hockenhull / Darcy Freeman vs Christina Lovera / Laura Williams3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesHeather MacIntyre / Arianne George vs Victoria Kendall / Lisa Thiesen6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2024-11-16vs IRMSL/Houri/18&overWLost 02
L#1 DoublesStacy Hockenhull / Darcy Freeman vs Sandy Palma / Chloe Spruill3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesHeather MacIntyre / Christine Alfert vs Dina Cummings / Pollyanna Clark7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2024-11-12vs Nrs/DeGaetanoWon 20
W#2 DoublesDarcy Freeman / Stacy Hockenhull vs Sharon DeGaetano / Christina Lovera6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeather MacIntyre / Christine Alfert vs Brenda Gimpl / Victoria Kendall6-4, 6-4
2024-11-07vs Nrs/DeGaetanoLost 01
L#1 DoublesStacy Hockenhull / Darcy Freeman vs Laura Williams / Christina Lovera2-6, 2-6
2024-10-26vs IRMSL/Houri/18&overWSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDarcy Freeman / Stacy Hockenhull vs Dina Cummings / Pamela Houri6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesChristine Alfert / Arianne George vs Marguerite Madden / Elisabeth Smith2-6, 0-6
2024-10-24vs IRMSL/Houri/18&overWLost 01
L#1 DoublesStacy Hockenhull / Darcy Freeman vs Tanya Mikel / Guadalupe Avinzano0-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Christine Alfert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Betsy Sturgis
published 4.5
3.86
Darcy Freeman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Arianne George
published 4
3.70
Kate Simpson
published
3.60
Stacy Hockenhull
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.45
Heather MacIntyre
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Hockenhull + Kate Simpson8162% games+11.2% vs expected
Heather MacIntyre + Stacy Hockenhull4944% gamesnot enough data
Darcy Freeman + Stacy Hockenhull3545% gamesnot enough data
Darcy Freeman + Kate Simpson314 matchesnot enough data
Darcy Freeman + Betsy Sturgis224 matchesnot enough data
Heather MacIntyre + Arianne George033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christine Alfert
36W–42L career · 3 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
4.08
4.5
Betsy Sturgis
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
4.05
4
Darcy Freeman
16W–18L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Arianne George
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
Kate Simpson
12W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%8%92%
3.70
Stacy Hockenhull
48W–48L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.60
Heather MacIntyre
39W–62L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.