Teams

IRMSL/Houri/18&overW

2024 IRMSL Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-17vs Nrs/DeGaetanoLost 12
L#1 DoublesRegan Chatel / Pollyanna Clark vs Christina Lovera / Laura Williams2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMarguerite Madden / Sandy Palma vs Deborah Cone / Kathleen Bourret4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTanya Mikel / Guadalupe Avinzano vs Lisa Thiesen / Susan Gore6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2024-11-16vs Vero Club Tennis - SoutherlyWon 30
W#1 DoublesSandy Palma / Chloe Spruill vs Stacy Hockenhull / Darcy Freeman6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesTanya Mikel / Guadalupe Avinzano vs Kate Simpson / Betsy Sturgis6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDina Cummings / Pollyanna Clark vs Heather MacIntyre / Christine Alfert5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2024-11-09vs Nrs/DeGaetanoSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDina Cummings / Marguerite Madden vs Victoria Kendall / Susan Gore6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesPollyanna Clark / Regan Chatel vs Karin Decoste / Sharon DeGaetano0-6, 3-6
2024-10-26vs Vero Club Tennis - SoutherlyWon 21
W#1 DoublesPollyanna Clark / Regan Chatel vs Betsy Sturgis / Kate Simpson6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDina Cummings / Pamela Houri vs Darcy Freeman / Stacy Hockenhull3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMarguerite Madden / Elisabeth Smith vs Christine Alfert / Arianne George6-2, 6-0
2024-10-24vs Vero Club Tennis - SoutherlyLost 12
W#1 DoublesTanya Mikel / Guadalupe Avinzano vs Stacy Hockenhull / Darcy Freeman6-0, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMarguerite Madden / Dina Cummings vs Betsy Sturgis / Kate Simpson3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPamela Houri / Regan Chatel vs Jane Wilkey / Arianne George3-6, 2-6
2024-10-12vs Nrs/DeGaetanoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPamela Houri / Tanya Mikel vs Deborah Cone / Kathleen Bourret4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGuadalupe Avinzano / Elisabeth Smith vs Brenda Gimpl / Susan Gore6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Chloe Spruill
published 4.5
4.34
Marguerite Madden
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.12
Guadalupe Avinzano
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.09
Pollyanna Clark
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.99
Dina Cummings
published
3.74
Pamela Houri
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.71
Regan Chatel
published
3.70
Sandy Palma
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Elisabeth Smith
published
Tanya Mikel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chloe Spruill + Marguerite Madden5060% games+5.7% vs expected
Sandy Palma + Marguerite Madden8453% gamesnot enough data
Sandy Palma + Guadalupe Avinzano4446% gamesnot enough data
Sandy Palma + Pamela Houri6163% gamesnot enough data
Sandy Palma + Dina Cummings7064% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Houri + Marguerite Madden3446% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Houri + Guadalupe Avinzano3250% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Houri + Dina Cummings404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chloe Spruill
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
4.37
4.5
Marguerite Madden
114W–45L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
4.34
4.5
Guadalupe Avinzano
101W–66L career · 4 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
4.12
Pollyanna Clark
25W–34L career · 4 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
4.09
Dina Cummings
17W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
3.99
Pamela Houri
64W–67L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.74
Regan Chatel
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%6%94%
3.71
Sandy Palma
119W–104L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%8%92%
3.70
Elisabeth Smith
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tanya Mikel
12W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.