Teams

Nrs/DeGaetano

2024 IRMSL Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.33 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-17vs IRMSL/Houri/18&overWSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDeborah Cone / Kathleen Bourret vs Marguerite Madden / Sandy Palma6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Thiesen / Susan Gore vs Tanya Mikel / Guadalupe Avinzano1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-11-21vs Vero Club Tennis - SoutherlyWon 10
W#2 DoublesKarin Decoste / Sharon DeGaetano vs Betsy Sturgis / Kate Simpson6-2, 7-5
2024-11-12vs Vero Club Tennis - SoutherlyLost 02
L#1 DoublesKarin Decoste / Lisa Thiesen vs Kate Simpson / Betsy Sturgis6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBrenda Gimpl / Victoria Kendall vs Heather MacIntyre / Christine Alfert4-6, 4-6
2024-11-09vs IRMSL/Houri/18&overWSplit 11
L#2 DoublesVictoria Kendall / Susan Gore vs Dina Cummings / Marguerite Madden4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKarin Decoste / Sharon DeGaetano vs Pollyanna Clark / Regan Chatel6-0, 6-3
2024-11-07vs Vero Club Tennis - SoutherlyWon 10
W#2 DoublesKarin Decoste / Sharon DeGaetano vs Kate Simpson / Arianne George6-4, 6-2
2024-10-12vs IRMSL/Houri/18&overWLost 12
W#1 DoublesDeborah Cone / Kathleen Bourret vs Pamela Houri / Tanya Mikel6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKarin Decoste / Lisa Thiesen vs Regan Chatel / Chloe Spruill5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBrenda Gimpl / Susan Gore vs Guadalupe Avinzano / Elisabeth Smith0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Deborah Cone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.32
Karin Decoste
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
4.05
Christina Lovera
published 4.5
3.99
Sharon DeGaetano
published
3.82
Brenda Gimpl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Susan Gore
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lisa Thiesen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Gore + Deborah Cone2347% gamesnot enough data
Susan Gore + Karin Decoste3254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Deborah Cone
20W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
4.43
Karin Decoste
55W–35L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Christina Lovera
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
4.05
Sharon DeGaetano
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.99
4
Brenda Gimpl
145W–90L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
Susan Gore
58W–62L career · 3 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.62
Lisa Thiesen
2W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.