Teams

BRMST BLACK

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-01vs RMTC BLACKWon 10
W#1 SinglesDrew Carroll vs Adli Waziri6-1, 6-0
2022-05-24vs CVTA BLUELost 01
L#1 SinglesDrew Carroll vs Steve Harford5-7, 2-6
2022-05-17vs MEA GREENLost 01
L#1 SinglesDrew Carroll vs Mark Sladden4-6, 3-6
2022-05-10vs TTA BLACKLost 01
L#1 SinglesDrew Carroll vs Kevin Darby0-6, 4-6
2022-04-19vs NJ BLACKLost 01
L#2 SinglesDrew Carroll vs Jeff Richker2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
John Post
published
3.30
Thomas Quinn
published
3.21
Joel Walter
published
3.15
Drew Carroll
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
2.91
Glenn Fleckenstein
published 3.5
Coleman Flaherty
published 3
Herb Covey
published 3
John Herby
published
Kent MacLennan
published
Kip Hertzenberg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Glenn Fleckenstein + Joel Walter4258% games+12.0% vs expected
Drew Carroll + Joel Walter3250% games+7.2% vs expected
Thomas Quinn + Joel Walter3258% games+5.7% vs expected
Thomas Quinn + Glenn Fleckenstein4352% games+2.9% vs expected
Drew Carroll + Glenn Fleckenstein2640% games−5.9% vs expected
Glenn Fleckenstein + John Post3440% games−14.2% vs expected
Thomas Quinn + Drew Carroll224 matchesnot enough data
Kent MacLennan + Joel Walter314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Post
22W–41L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Thomas Quinn
63W–73L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Joel Walter
53W–44L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Drew Carroll
84W–112L career · 5 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Glenn Fleckenstein
31W–50L career · no lines in 2022
75%25%<1%
2.91
3
Coleman Flaherty
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Herb Covey
9W–33L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
John Herby
13W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kent MacLennan
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kip Hertzenberg
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.