RMTC BLACK
2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER
11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Schedule6 played
i
Flight standings52 teams · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1DTC PURPLE | 7 | 0 | 14 | 226 |
| 2GAC PURPLE | 6 | 0 | 18 | 195 |
| 3BCC GOLD | 6 | 1 | 20 | 245 |
| 4SSHP BLUE | 6 | 1 | 23 | 250 |
| 5BM BLUE | 6 | 1 | 33 | 265 |
| 6WC BLUE | 5 | 2 | 31 | 305 |
| 7CVTA BLACK | 5 | 2 | 32 | 267 |
| 8BTA ORANGE | 5 | 2 | 34 | 274 |
| 9SS-G YELLOW | 5 | 2 | 34 | 317 |
| 10APR BLUE | 5 | 2 | 36 | 304 |
| 11BRMST YELLOW | 5 | 2 | 36 | 318 |
| 12ATC GREEN | 4 | 3 | 27 | 255 |
| 13GTC YELLOW | 4 | 3 | 31 | 269 |
| 14WP BLACK | 4 | 3 | 32 | 318 |
| 15KC-RH PINK | 4 | 3 | 32 | 280 |
| 16GTC TEAL | 4 | 3 | 38 | 320 |
| 17PRKR RED | 4 | 3 | 42 | 313 |
| 18GTC PINK | 4 | 3 | 45 | 333 |
| 19PTC PINK | 3 | 3 | 33 | 254 |
| 20CHCC RED | 3 | 4 | 36 | 297 |
| 21CVTA GOLD | 3 | 4 | 39 | 306 |
| 22BCC PINK | 3 | 4 | 40 | 309 |
| 23SKY GREY | 3 | 4 | 40 | 317 |
| 24TTA GOLD | 3 | 4 | 42 | 335 |
| 25PCC GOLD | 3 | 4 | 42 | 326 |
| 26GR NAVY | 3 | 4 | 45 | 362 |
| 27KNO GOLD | 3 | 4 | 45 | 351 |
| 28SSLT GOLD | 2 | 4 | 41 | 280 |
| 29LEBTC YELLOW | 2 | 5 | 38 | 317 |
| 30KC-CC NAVY | 2 | 5 | 40 | 320 |
| 31GPTC RED | 2 | 5 | 44 | 344 |
| 32VC TEAL | 2 | 5 | 44 | 324 |
| 33CM ORANGE | 2 | 5 | 45 | 343 |
| 34HV SILVER | 2 | 5 | 45 | 312 |
| 35PRKR TEAL | 2 | 5 | 45 | 345 |
| 36CACI GREEN | 2 | 5 | 46 | 321 |
| 37PCC SILVER | 2 | 5 | 46 | 342 |
| 38BRMST SILVER | 2 | 5 | 50 | 339 |
| 39CCC GREEN | 2 | 5 | 56 | 363 |
| 40HFII ORANGE | 1 | 4 | 35 | 248 |
| 41SSD BLUE | 1 | 6 | 48 | 356 |
| 42CM NAVY | 1 | 6 | 48 | 350 |
| 43SSLT MAROON | 1 | 6 | 51 | 356 |
| 44EM YELLOW | 1 | 6 | 51 | 367 |
| 45HIW MAROON | 1 | 6 | 51 | 360 |
| 46TTA PINK | 1 | 6 | 51 | 357 |
| 47CVTA NAVY | 1 | 6 | 54 | 375 |
| 48HW YELLOW | 1 | 6 | 62 | 388 |
| 49CVTA ORANGE | 0 | 7 | 52 | 351 |
| 50GR SILVER | 0 | 7 | 55 | 365 |
| 51MC NAVY | 0 | 7 | 56 | 366 |
| 52RMTC BLACK | 0 | 7 | 58 | 362 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Cecil MacGregor + Richard Bagley | 5–2 | 57% games | +4.7% vs expected |
| Daniel Angst + Bill Melvin | 1–3 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Daniel Angst + Danny Wages | 2–2 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Daniel Angst + Glen Sieroslawski | 0–3 | 3 matches | not enough data |
| Richard Bagley + Jim Latsko | 2–1 | 3 matches | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.