Teams

BRMST GREEN

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-04vs NJ BLACKLost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Ipsen / Mike Dery vs Girish Nair / Amal Chandran1-6, 3-6
2022-05-24vs RMTC BLACKLost 12
W#1 DoublesMike Dery / David Ipsen vs Dan Raykovitz / Danny Wages6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesStephane Billat vs John Koval5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPhilip Cangilla / Peter Nielsen vs Jim Latsko / Glen Sieroslawski4-6, 2-6
2022-05-17vs CVTA BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesMike Dery / David Ipsen vs Daniel Flynn / Thomas Booth6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesStephane Billat / Thomas Rogers vs Todd Neely / Andrew Meseck6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKen Claussen / Philip Cangilla vs David Guan / Robert Harberg6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-05-10vs MEA GREENSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDavid Ipsen / Mike Dery vs Eric Six / Chris Whittaker1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJoJo Brotamonte / Stephane Billat vs William Sivy / Steve Craig7-5, 6-4
2022-05-03vs TTA BLACKLost 02
L#1 DoublesMike Dery / David Ipsen vs Kevin Darby / Randy Bell5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPhilip Cangilla / JoJo Brotamonte vs Nile Knez / Steven Allscheid2-6, 1-6
2022-04-26vs BRMST BLACKWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrad Thurman / JoJo Brotamonte vs Thomas Quinn / Jason Brown3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Ipsen / Mike Dery vs Kip Hertzenberg / John Post6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
JoJo Brotamonte
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Stephane Billat
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Thomas Rogers
published
2.79
Philip Cangilla
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
David Ipsen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Ken Claussen
published
Mike Dery
published
Peter Nielsen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ken Claussen + Thomas Rogers3445% games−1.7% vs expected
David Ipsen + Mike Dery2543% games−3.4% vs expected
Stephane Billat + David Ipsen2339% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Rogers + Mike Dery224 matchesnot enough data
Stephane Billat + Mike Dery123 matchesnot enough data
David Ipsen + Ken Claussen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
JoJo Brotamonte
50W–58L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Stephane Billat
98W–83L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
Thomas Rogers
22W–32L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Philip Cangilla
17W–56L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
3
David Ipsen
31W–74L career · 6 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72
Ken Claussen
6W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mike Dery
8W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Peter Nielsen
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.