Teams

MEA GREEN

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-24vs TTA BLACKLost 01
L#2 DoublesChris Whittaker / Bill Martin vs Michael Fullerton / Randy Bell3-6, 1-6
2022-05-17vs BRMST BLACKLost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Whittaker / Eric Six vs Joel Walter / Thomas Quinn2-6, 1-6
2022-05-10vs BRMST GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesEric Six / Chris Whittaker vs David Ipsen / Mike Dery6-1, 6-2
2022-05-03vs NJ BLACKLost 01
L#1 SinglesChris Whittaker vs Martin Wong3-6, 2-6
2022-04-27vs RMTC BLACKLost 01
L#3 DoublesWilliam Sivy / Chris Whittaker vs John Koval / Jim Latsko6-7, 3-6
2022-04-19vs CVTA BLUEWon 10
W#3 DoublesWilliam Sivy / Chris Whittaker vs Michael Yelvington / Todd Neely6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Mark Sladden
published
3.50
John Hamm
published
3.29
Geoff Noyes
published 3.5
3.29
John Ruder
published
Eric Six
published 3.5
3.16
Bill Martin
published 3.5
3.10
Steve Craig
published
3.05
William Fry
published
3.05
Andy Pobywajlo
published 3.5
2.98
William Sivy
published
2.97
Chris Whittaker
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Ruder + Geoff Noyes8169% games+12.5% vs expected
John Ruder + William Sivy4253% games+0.8% vs expected
John Hamm + Geoff Noyes2444% games−4.5% vs expected
Andy Pobywajlo + John Ruder2347% games−7.3% vs expected
William Fry + Mark Sladden224 matchesnot enough data
Steve Craig + Eric Six314 matchesnot enough data
Andy Pobywajlo + Geoff Noyes314 matchesnot enough data
John Hamm + William Sivy314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Sladden
40W–9L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
John Hamm
33W–32L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.50
3.5
Geoff Noyes
27W–21L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
John Ruder
24W–14L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Eric Six
12W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Bill Martin
15W–17L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.16
Steve Craig
14W–15L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
William Fry
21W–51L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Andy Pobywajlo
15W–19L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.05
William Sivy
14W–23L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.98
3.5
Chris Whittaker
41W–81L career · 6 lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.