Teams

Olalere 3.0W Fall Singles Sunday

2025 Piedmont Fall Singles · 3.0 Women Fall Singles

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 SinglesRachel Bryant vs Kelen Walker3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAngela Olalere vs Kathy Falls0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesKimberley Cathey vs Rebecca Morrison1-6, 2-6
2025-10-05vs Ray 3.0W Fall Singles SundayWon 21
L#1 SinglesAndrea Spencer vs Kim Edwards2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAnnie Vorys vs Allyson Wood6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesKimberley Cathey vs Angela Duke7-5, 6-2
2025-09-21vs Holtzman 3.0W Fall Singles SundayLost 12
W#1 SinglesRachel Bryant vs Joanna Ashe6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMeghan Flynn vs Heidi Boswell6-7, 4-6
L#3 SinglesWhitney Gansman vs Ariel Holtzman5-7, 3-6
2025-09-14vs Kuebert 3.0W Fall Singles SundayWon 21
W#1 SinglesRachel Bryant vs Suki Gutierrez6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAngela Olalere vs Tara Rusiewicz1-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesAndrea Spencer vs Graceanne Schuster6-1, 6-2
2025-08-24vs Gonzalez 3.0W Fall Singles SundayLost 12
W#1 SinglesRachel Bryant vs Ji Kim6-2, 7-6
L#2 SinglesWhitney Gansman vs Julia Saguier6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesAnnie Vorys vs Clara Gonzalez Flores0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesRachel Bryant vs Sammie Jo McCluskey6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAngela Olalere vs Jennifer Ayers4-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesRachel Bryant vs Jamie Cunningham6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMeghan Flynn vs Rebecca Sheppard4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 SinglesAnnie Vorys vs Jennifer Murphy0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Fall Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Rachel Bryant
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.86
Andrea Spencer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.85
Whitney Gansman
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.84
Kimberley Cathey
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.82
Annie Vorys
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.72
Meghan Flynn
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.61
Gail Little
published
2.58
Angela Olalere
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Annie Vorys + Andrea Spencer1641% games+2.4% vs expected
Angela Olalere + Gail Little1641% games+2.1% vs expected
Angela Olalere + Andrea Spencer2350% games+0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Bryant
44W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
3
Andrea Spencer
17W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
Whitney Gansman
8W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Kimberley Cathey
23W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Annie Vorys
21W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Meghan Flynn
17W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Gail Little
7W–15L career · no lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
2.61
3
Angela Olalere
10W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.