Teams

Gonzalez 3.0W Fall Singles Sunday

2025 Piedmont Fall Singles · 3.0 Women Fall Singles

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 SinglesRhonda Wakefield vs Radha Singh1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesClara Gonzalez Flores vs Louise Albright6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesJulia Saguier vs Emily Owen6-1, 6-2
2025-10-05vs Kuebert 3.0W Fall Singles SundayWon 20
W#2 SinglesCozetta Gaines vs Kylie Roy3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJulia Saguier vs Whitney Kuebert6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDiana Angeles vs Kathleen Mooney0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRhonda Wakefield vs Jennifer Ayers1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesMeredith Vaughn vs Jane Forbes Fields4-6, 0-6
2025-09-21vs Ray 3.0W Fall Singles SundayLost 01
L#2 SinglesRhonda Wakefield vs Allyson Wood5-7, 4-6
2025-09-14vs Holtzman 3.0W Fall Singles SundayLost 03
L#1 SinglesCozetta Gaines vs Della Crone2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesDiana Angeles vs Jennifer Newkirk1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesMeredith Vaughn vs Barbara Robinson0-6, 0-6
2025-08-24vs Olalere 3.0W Fall Singles SundayWon 20
W#2 SinglesJulia Saguier vs Whitney Gansman1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 SinglesClara Gonzalez Flores vs Annie Vorys6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesCozetta Gaines vs Teri Bramsway4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesClara Gonzalez Flores vs Jennifer Murphy3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesDiana Angeles vs Aimee Largen6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesClara Gonzalez Flores vs Sharlotte Brooks6-1, 6-3
L#3 SinglesMeredith Vaughn vs Alyssa Way1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Fall Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Clara Gonzalez Flores
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
2.81
Cozetta Gaines
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.80
Diana Angeles
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.50
Julia Saguier
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.48
Rhonda Wakefield
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.40
Meredith Vaughn
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julia Saguier + Meredith Vaughn123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Clara Gonzalez Flores
43W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Cozetta Gaines
17W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Diana Angeles
16W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Julia Saguier
32W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%49%51%
2.50
Rhonda Wakefield
6W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
Meredith Vaughn
7W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%76%24%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.