Teams

NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW6.5A

2021 COMBO · Women 6.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Deirdre Burke
published 4
3.33
Jacynthe Hamel
published 3.5
3.23
Samanda Dorger
published
3.17
Magaly Otero
published
3.14
Lisa Eichler
published
3.10
Jennifer Locke
published
2.94
Kristen Kincaid
published
2.94
Kathleen Herrera
published
2.92
Wendy Lombardi
published
2.92
Celia Welch
published 3
2.79
Colleen Winters
published 3
2.63
Nancy Tarantino
published
2.43
Barbara Lum
published 3
Margaret Angelovich
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Colleen Winters + Celia Welch4261% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Deirdre Burke
5W–8L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.76
3.5
Jacynthe Hamel
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.33
Samanda Dorger
17W–11L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Magaly Otero
6W–16L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.17
Lisa Eichler
2W–12L career · no lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14
Jennifer Locke
2W–7L career · no lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.10
Kristen Kincaid
15W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
2.94
Kathleen Herrera
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
69%31%<1%
2.94
Wendy Lombardi
7W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Celia Welch
8W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Colleen Winters
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.79
Nancy Tarantino
6W–6L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
2.63
3
Barbara Lum
6W–7L career · no lines in 2021
72%28%<1%
2.43
Margaret Angelovich
10W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.