Teams

Glickman/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 4.0 Women - WED AM

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-04-14vs Ranero/Yung-Okamoto/NashvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesChris Leonard / Traci Holton vs Cindy Knapp / Lolo Fuhrman6-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAlma Islas vs Courtney Hess6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHeidi Nickel / Heather Wire vs Heather Laney / Kathleen Doulin3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesErin Akery vs Abigail Kirkman7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesHeather Brandon / Kristen Conoley vs Julie Segura / Hollie Williams6-7, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women - WED AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Erin Akery
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.99
Alma Islas
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.88
Kristen Conoley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Cindy Puckett
published 4
3.68
Diana Buss
published 4
3.68
Regan Baltasar
published
3.68
Heather Wire
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Heidi Nickel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Saba Chishti
published
3.49
Traci Holton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.48
Heather Brandon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.41
Shari Glickman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Sally Major
published
3.32
Mariam Haider
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shari Glickman + Traci Holton4460% games+13.6% vs expected
Kristen Conoley + Heather Brandon2352% games−0.3% vs expected
Heather Wire + Heidi Nickel5849% games−1.8% vs expected
Diana Buss + Shari Glickman123 matchesnot enough data
Traci Holton + Heather Brandon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erin Akery
18W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%44%56%
4.02
4
Alma Islas
17W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.99
Kristen Conoley
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Cindy Puckett
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Diana Buss
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.68
Regan Baltasar
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.68
Heather Wire
6W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Heidi Nickel
70W–63L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Saba Chishti
2W–14L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.52
Traci Holton
11W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Heather Brandon
24W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.48
Shari Glickman
42W–39L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Sally Major
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.34
Mariam Haider
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.