Teams

Goy 40+ 4.0W Singles Mon PM

2025 Piedmont Singles 40+ · 4.0 Women Singles Mon PM

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 SinglesKimberly Franz vs Rolinde Cleyman2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMandi Clift vs Melissa Goodman4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesKimberly Halsey vs Jessica Smith5-7, 0-6
L#3 SinglesCrystal Mercado vs Carrie McElvogue5-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMandi Clift vs Carrie McElvogue6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesKimberly Halsey vs Melissa Goodman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKimberly Franz vs Kelly Gekas2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesChetana Honnarayanahalli vs Julie Dover4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKara Ray vs Rolinde Cleyman6-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesGina Goy vs Carol Schuck Dillon2-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesCrystal Mercado vs Stephanie Gilmer6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Singles Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Kara Ray
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.62
Crystal Mercado
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.53
Kimberly Franz
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
3.50
Gina Goy
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.50
Kimberly Halsey
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.42
Chetana Honnarayanahalli
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.36
Mandi Clift
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.28
Melissa Gujrati
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chetana Honnarayanahalli + Gina Goy41142% games+3.9% vs expected
Kimberly Halsey + Kimberly Franz8358% games+0.1% vs expected
Crystal Mercado + Gina Goy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kara Ray
17W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Crystal Mercado
67W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.62
Kimberly Franz
41W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.53
Gina Goy
33W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
Kimberly Halsey
57W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
4
Chetana Honnarayanahalli
30W–30L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.42
Mandi Clift
27W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.36
Melissa Gujrati
18W–22L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.