Teams

Goodman/Cleyman 40+ 4.0W Singles Mon PM

2025 Piedmont Singles 40+ · 4.0 Women Singles Mon PM

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-28vs Goy 40+ 4.0W Singles Mon PMWon 20
W#1 SinglesRolinde Cleyman vs Kimberly Franz6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesCarrie McElvogue vs Courtney Jones6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesMelissa Goodman vs Kelly Gekas2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesDabney Porter vs Julie Dover4-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesCarrie McElvogue vs Tracy Harlan0-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCarrie McElvogue vs Susan Parsons1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesStephanie Gilmer vs Melissa Beeson1-6, 6-7
2025-07-07vs Goy 40+ 4.0W Singles Mon PMWon 20
W#1 SinglesMelissa Goodman vs Mandi Clift6-4, 6-3
W#3 SinglesCarrie McElvogue vs Crystal Mercado7-5, 6-0
L#1 SinglesCarol Schuck Dillon vs Kelly Gekas1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesMelissa Goodman vs Stephanie Farabow2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 SinglesCarrie McElvogue vs Julie Dover3-6, 4-6
2025-06-22vs Goy 40+ 4.0W Singles Mon PMWon 21
L#1 SinglesCarrie McElvogue vs Mandi Clift1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesMelissa Goodman vs Kimberly Halsey3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesCarol Schuck Dillon vs Courtney Jones6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMelissa Goodman vs Melissa Beeson6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesDabney Porter vs Susan Parsons6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesRolinde Cleyman vs Penny Trivette6-4, 6-4
2025-06-01vs Goy 40+ 4.0W Singles Mon PMWon 21
W#1 SinglesRolinde Cleyman vs Kara Ray7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesCarol Schuck Dillon vs Gina Goy6-2, 6-0
L#3 SinglesStephanie Gilmer vs Crystal Mercado2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Singles Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Dabney Porter
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.63
Carol Schuck Dillon
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.57
Melissa Goodman
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.43
Carrie McElvogue
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.32
Rolinde Cleyman
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.21
Stephanie Gilmer
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dabney Porter
12W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Carol Schuck Dillon
11W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
Melissa Goodman
41W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.57
4
Carrie McElvogue
4W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
Rolinde Cleyman
5W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.32
Stephanie Gilmer
11W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.