Teams

Beeson/Dover 40+ 4.0W Singles Mon PM

2025 Piedmont Singles 40+ · 4.0 Women Singles Mon PM

8 players · average NTRP / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-04vs Goy 40+ 4.0W Singles Mon PMWon 20
W#2 SinglesLayne Saunders vs Crystal Mercado6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesKim Hunt vs Chetana Honnarayanahalli6-1, 7-6
W#1 SinglesKelly Gekas vs Melissa Goodman6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJulie Dover vs Dabney Porter6-4, 6-4
L#3 SinglesTracy Harlan vs Carrie McElvogue6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesStephanie Farabow vs Jessica Smith7-6, 6-1
W#3 SinglesMelissa Beeson vs Stephanie Gilmer6-1, 7-6
2025-07-14vs Goy 40+ 4.0W Singles Mon PMLost 01
L#3 SinglesKim Hunt vs Gina Goy3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKelly Gekas vs Carol Schuck Dillon6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesStephanie Farabow vs Melissa Goodman6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 SinglesJulie Dover vs Carrie McElvogue6-3, 6-4
2025-06-23vs Goy 40+ 4.0W Singles Mon PMSplit 11
W#1 SinglesLayne Saunders vs Kara Ray6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesKim Hunt vs Kimberly Halsey4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesMelissa Beeson vs Melissa Goodman3-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesPenny Trivette vs Rolinde Cleyman4-6, 4-6
2025-06-02vs Goy 40+ 4.0W Singles Mon PMWon 30
W#1 SinglesKelly Gekas vs Kimberly Franz6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJulie Dover vs Chetana Honnarayanahalli6-4, 6-2
W#3 SinglesTracy Harlan vs Courtney Jones6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Singles Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Layne Saunders
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.79
Penny Trivette
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.74
Kelly Gekas
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.69
Julie Dover
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.65
Tracy Harlan
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.61
Kim Hunt
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.59
Stephanie Farabow
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.56
Melissa Beeson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Hunt + Tracy Harlan224 matchesnot enough data
Kim Hunt + Penny Trivette033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Layne Saunders
153W–75L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
Penny Trivette
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
Kelly Gekas
31W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
Julie Dover
41W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Tracy Harlan
23W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.65
Kim Hunt
222W–161L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Stephanie Farabow
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.59
Melissa Beeson
13W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.