Teams

GSCC PURPLE

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - MOUNTAINS

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-11vs GSCC SILVERSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMiranda Wagler vs Jean Allard6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmy Roggie / Katie Winder vs Meghan Hegberg / Brady Emens1-6, 1-6
2024-06-10Won 10
W#1 SinglesMiranda Wagler vs Natalie Torres6-1, 6-0
2024-06-03vs RVR GOLDWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmy Roggie / Sasha Enewold vs Diane Boat / Dianne Leoni6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMiranda Wagler vs Nancy Harris6-1, 6-1
2024-05-20vs BASALT GOLDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAfton Larsen / Amy Roggie vs Ashley Richardson / Molly Jones1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMiranda Wagler / Katie Winder vs Corin Brucker / Karen Price5-7, 6-0, 1-0
2024-05-13vs CROWN REDWon 20
W#1 SinglesAmy Roggie vs Kimberly Welsh6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMiranda Wagler / Susie Demers vs Judi Simecek / Kathy Robinson2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-05-06vs GSCC SILVERSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMiranda Wagler vs Kristen Foote2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Roggie / Afton Larsen vs Megan Hayes / Erin Zalinski1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Miranda Wagler
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.43
Amy Roggie
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.38
Mary Boyd
published
2.99
Susie Demers
published
2.43
Afton Larsen
published 3
Katie Winder
published
Mckenzie Winder
published
Sasha Enewold
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Roggie + Mary Boyd5256% games−2.4% vs expected
Amy Roggie + Miranda Wagler5081% gamesnot enough data
Sasha Enewold + Amy Roggie303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Miranda Wagler
84W–40L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%23%77%
3.60
3.5
Amy Roggie
95W–47L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
Mary Boyd
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.38
Susie Demers
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Afton Larsen
2W–12L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
2.43
Katie Winder
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mckenzie Winder
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sasha Enewold
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.