Teams

BASALT GOLD

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - MOUNTAINS

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-10vs RVR GOLDWon 20
W#1 DoublesAshley Richardson / Leslie Riddel vs Diane Boat / Margaret Corcillo7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMonica Cohan / Corin Brucker vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-08vs CROWN REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesAshley Richardson / Leslie Riddel vs Crystal McNamee / Kimberly Welsh1-6, 4-6
2024-06-03vs GSCC SILVERLost 01
L#1 DoublesAshley Richardson / Adele Melnick vs Megan Hayes / Erin Zalinski0-6, 4-6
2024-05-30vs CROWN REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesCorin Brucker / Leslie Riddel vs Judi Simecek / Kathy Robinson6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2024-05-20vs GSCC PURPLEWon 21
W#1 DoublesAshley Richardson / Molly Jones vs Afton Larsen / Amy Roggie6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCorin Brucker / Karen Price vs Miranda Wagler / Katie Winder7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLeslie Riddel / Monica Cohan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-13vs GSCC BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesAshley Richardson / Tierney White vs Siri Olsen / Jenell Hilderbrand0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Denise Taylor
published 3.5
3.30
Karen Price
published
3.18
Adele Melnick
published 3.5
3.00
Ashley Richardson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Leslie Riddel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.92
Corin Brucker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.76
Monica Cohan
published
Marilyn Ortmann
published
Tierney White
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Riddel + Ashley Richardson222846% games−0.1% vs expected
Corin Brucker + Leslie Riddel134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Taylor
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.37
Karen Price
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Adele Melnick
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Ashley Richardson
41W–53L career · 5 lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.00
3.5
Leslie Riddel
34W–47L career · 4 lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
2.94
3.5
Corin Brucker
39W–58L career · 3 lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
2.92
Monica Cohan
0W–8L career · no lines in 2024
96%4%<1%
2.76
Marilyn Ortmann
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tierney White
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.