Teams

RVR GOLD

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - MOUNTAINS

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-10vs BASALT GOLDLost 01
L#2 DoublesLeslie Keery / Nancy Harris vs Molly Jones / Karen Price0-6, 1-6
2024-06-08vs GSCC BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesLeslie Keery / Margaret Corcillo vs Anne Sale / Heather Howe2-6, 3-6
2024-06-03vs GSCC PURPLEWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Given / Susan Blizzard vs Mary Boyd / Susie Demers6-2, 6-2
2024-05-22vs GSCC BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmy Filiss / Alicia Keleher vs Siri Olsen / Anne Sale3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Blizzard / Makenzie Eshelman vs Stacey Adams / Keely Eberly6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2024-05-18vs CROWN REDWon 20
W#2 DoublesSusan Blizzard / Olivia Emery vs Andrea Olson / Rachel Cossman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Filiss / Leslie Keery vs Vivian Williams / Tatum Rees6-1, 6-3
2024-05-13vs GSCC SILVERLost 02
L#2 DoublesOlivia Emery / Susan Blizzard vs Meghan Hegberg / Amy Thornton6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNancy Harris / Leslie Keery vs Kate McRaith / Briar Schreiber3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Dianne Leoni
published 3.5
3.44
Diane Boat
published 3.5
3.36
Makenzie Eshelman
published
3.29
Susan Blizzard
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Amy Filiss
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Margaret Corcillo
published 3.5
3.13
Leslie Keery
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jennifer Given
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Blizzard + Diane Boat5153% gamesnot enough data
Diane Boat + Amy Filiss3357% gamesnot enough data
Amy Filiss + Leslie Keery5161% gamesnot enough data
Diane Boat + Dianne Leoni3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dianne Leoni
27W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Diane Boat
50W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.44
Makenzie Eshelman
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Susan Blizzard
63W–77L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Amy Filiss
41W–31L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Margaret Corcillo
3W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Leslie Keery
30W–46L career · 4 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
Jennifer Given
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.