Teams

IA/Krause&Bruntz/18&Over4.0W

2023 IA 18 & Over Adult League · 4.0 Women

19 players · average NTRP 4.00 / IOWA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-04-08vs Nixon & Rickert: LifeTimeWon 32
W#1 DoublesJulie Bruntz / Katie Kelleher vs Allison Anderson / Pamela Christoffers4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMary Krause vs Lucy White6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJenn Smith / Jessica Stewart vs Patty Avilez / Cristen Schipper6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesGreta Rath vs Tina Duenow6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSarah Corell / Angela Torgerson vs Wendy Rickert / Dina Dulaney2-6, 2-6
2023-03-25vs Rovner: GenesisWon 50
W#1 DoublesJenn Smith / Jessica Stewart vs Dawn Ver Steeg / Janet Johnson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesConnie VanRoekel vs Leslie Shipp7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKatie Kelleher / Jenn Willis vs Lori Marchese / Carla Ulan6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesGreta Rath vs Lynae Szemplinski6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMitzi Ecklund / Kathleen Weyers vs Karen Mann / Joy Bachmann6-1, 6-4
2023-03-04vs Nixon & Rickert: LifeTimeLost 23
W#1 DoublesJulie Bruntz / Meghan Bramlage vs Maria Fedorova / Allison Anderson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMary Krause vs Tina Duenow6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJenn Willis / Angela Torgerson vs Michelle Rice / Patty Avilez6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJen Brauch vs Dina Dulaney5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHeather Ditsworth / Kim Stewart vs Rebecca Studer / Jennifer Dovre6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2023-01-28vs Rovner: GenesisWon 50
W#1 DoublesKatie Kelleher / Jenn Smith vs Karen Mann / Liz Mallaney7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesConnie VanRoekel vs Kristen Johansen4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeather Ditsworth / Debbie Mackaman vs Janet Johnson / Willow Bauer6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMary Krause vs Lynae Szemplinski6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKalan Clark / Jen Brauch vs Britt Bremner / Kellie Hockmuth6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Jen Brauch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Debbie Mackaman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Jenn Smith
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.57
Meghan Bramlage
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Connie VanRoekel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.56
Mary Krause
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.50
Angela Torgerson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Sarah Corell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Julie Bruntz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Mitzi Ecklund
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Jenn Willis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Kathleen Weyers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Heather Ditsworth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Greta Rath
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Ewa Pratt
published
Kalan Clark
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Katie Kelleher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kelsey Porter
published
Kim Stewart
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Weyers + Angela Torgerson21163% games+15.8% vs expected
Debbie Mackaman + Katie Kelleher6159% games+13.8% vs expected
Kelsey Porter + Katie Kelleher3353% games+9.3% vs expected
Jen Brauch + Jenn Willis5161% games+4.2% vs expected
Mitzi Ecklund + Kathleen Weyers5352% games+1.8% vs expected
Mitzi Ecklund + Angela Torgerson3255% games+1.6% vs expected
Kalan Clark + Jen Brauch6259% games+0.6% vs expected
Sarah Corell + Angela Torgerson4652% games−0.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jen Brauch
29W–21L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Debbie Mackaman
27W–19L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jenn Smith
72W–31L career · 3 lines in 2023
27%72%<1%
3.58
Meghan Bramlage
23W–24L career · 1 line in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
Connie VanRoekel
27W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
Mary Krause
46W–20L career · 3 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Angela Torgerson
55W–31L career · 2 lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.50
Sarah Corell
15W–9L career · 1 line in 2023
60%40%<1%
3.46
Julie Bruntz
38W–33L career · 2 lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
3.40
Mitzi Ecklund
21W–10L career · 1 line in 2023
84%16%<1%
3.36
Jenn Willis
35W–20L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%22%78%
3.11
Kathleen Weyers
47W–15L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.10
Heather Ditsworth
53W–35L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%26%74%
3.09
Greta Rath
68W–62L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.02
Ewa Pratt
17W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kalan Clark
26W–9L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Katie Kelleher
48W–22L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kelsey Porter
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kim Stewart
13W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.