Teams

MC TEAL

2026 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.30 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-09vs NJ REDWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesKailyn Kampert / Gemma Koehler vs Kimberly Martin / Lily Shoup6-2, 6-1
2026-07-06vs TTA BLUESplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesGemma Koehler / Payton Kinler vs Sarah Vincent / Jordan Smith2-6, 1-6
W#1 Female SinglesJacqueline Wierzba vs Jessica Kroupa1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-07-02vs TTA BLUESplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesGemma Koehler / Payton Kinler vs Kaylee Henley / Jessica Kroupa3-6, 2-6
W#2 Female SinglesKylie Sumpter vs Kelsa Morgan6-0, 6-3
2026-06-18vs NJ REDWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesKylie Sumpter / Kailyn Kampert vs Nikki Allegretto / Kimberly Martin6-2, 6-2
W#2 Female SinglesGemma Koehler vs Callie Hennessy6-0, 7-5
2026-06-15vs NJ REDWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesKailyn Kampert / Jacqueline Wierzba vs Holland Asbach / Mary Virginia Simpson6-0, 6-4
2026-06-11vs TTA BLUEWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesKylie Sumpter / Payton Kinler vs Kelsa Morgan / Jessica Kroupa6-4, 7-6
W#1 Female SinglesJacqueline Wierzba vs Sara Mize7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CHCC RED701838123
2SS-LGT TEAL60162584
3MC TEAL601538113
4WP-G PINK6116512130
5BP GREEN43111024182
6WP-O TEAL339921162
7SS-LGT RED3491227200
8TTA BLUE2481020141
9LEBTC BLUE1541429194
10SKY NAVY0731837230

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Kylie Sumpter
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.63
Cristen Handley
published 3.5
3.47
Taylor Reynolds
published
3.44
Kailyn Kampert
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Jacqueline Wierzba
usually #1 Female Singles 67%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 3
3.10
Gemma Koehler
usually #1 Female Doubles 75%, also #2 Female Singles 25% · published 3
3.08
Payton Kinler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kylie Sumpter + Taylor Reynolds303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kylie Sumpter
50W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.73
3.5
Cristen Handley
4W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.63
Taylor Reynolds
12W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Kailyn Kampert
40W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.44
3
Jacqueline Wierzba
44W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.37
3
Gemma Koehler
15W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.10
Payton Kinler
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.