Teams

TTA BLUE

2026 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-16vs NJ REDLost 12
L#1 Female DoublesKaylee Henley / Sarah Vincent vs Holland Asbach / Molly Myers4-6, 2-6
W#1 Female SinglesSara Mize vs Lily Shoup6-4, 6-0
L#2 Female SinglesKelsa Morgan vs Kimberly Martin0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-07-06vs MC TEALLost 02
L#1 Female SinglesJessica Kroupa vs Jacqueline Wierzba6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 Female SinglesKelsa Morgan vs Cristen Handley0-6, 1-6
2026-07-02vs MC TEALSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesKaylee Henley / Jessica Kroupa vs Gemma Koehler / Payton Kinler6-3, 6-2
L#2 Female SinglesKelsa Morgan vs Kylie Sumpter0-6, 3-6
2026-06-25vs NJ REDSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesKaylee Henley / Sarah Vincent vs Nikki Allegretto / Molly Myers2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 Female SinglesSara Mize vs Nghi Hoang6-1, 6-2
2026-06-11vs MC TEALLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesKelsa Morgan / Jessica Kroupa vs Kylie Sumpter / Payton Kinler4-6, 6-7
L#1 Female SinglesSara Mize vs Jacqueline Wierzba5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-04vs NJ REDWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesKaylee Henley / Kelsa Morgan vs Mary Virginia Simpson / Molly Myers6-3, 6-4
W#2 Female SinglesSara Mize vs Bailey Duplessis6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CHCC RED701838123
2SS-LGT TEAL60162584
3MC TEAL601538113
4WP-G PINK6116512130
5BP GREEN43111024182
6WP-O TEAL339921162
7SS-LGT RED3491227200
8TTA BLUE2481020141
9LEBTC BLUE1541429194
10SKY NAVY0731837230

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Isabella Jacobs
published
3.45
Jessica Kroupa
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Female Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
Kaylee Henley
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Sara Mize
usually #2 Female Singles 50%, also #1 Female Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Sarah Vincent
published
2.88
Kelsa Morgan
usually #2 Female Singles 60%, also #1 Female Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelsa Morgan + Kaylee Henley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Isabella Jacobs
16W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Jessica Kroupa
45W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Kaylee Henley
105W–44L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Sara Mize
25W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
Sarah Vincent
16W–9L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Kelsa Morgan
39W–60L career · 5 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.