Teams

CHCC RED

2026 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-15vs WP-G PINKLost 01
L#2 Female SinglesKelsey Cullen vs Carolyn Welter4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-07-09vs BP GREENWon 10
W#1 Female SinglesKelsey Cullen vs Celine Fucci6-1, 6-1
2026-06-25vs SKY NAVYWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesKelsey Cullen / Michaela Redlingshafer vs Elizabeth Wallace / Katelin Ramer6-4, 6-4
2026-06-18vs SS-LGT REDWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesKelsey Cullen / Niki Goldberg vs Maggie Carson / Natasha Cochran6-4, 6-0
W#1 Female SinglesMaggie Dornseif vs Tess Batchelder7-5, 6-2
2026-06-11Won 10
W#1 Female SinglesMaggie Dornseif vs Veronique Benard6-0, 6-0
2026-06-04vs BP GREENWon 10
W#2 Female SinglesMaggie Dornseif vs KATIE GUYON6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CHCC RED701838123
2SS-LGT TEAL60162584
3MC TEAL601538113
4WP-G PINK6116512130
5BP GREEN43111024182
6WP-O TEAL339921162
7SS-LGT RED3491227200
8TTA BLUE2481020141
9LEBTC BLUE1541429194
10SKY NAVY0731837230

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
3.47
Kelsey Cullen
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.45
Maggie Dornseif
usually #1 Female Singles 67%, also #2 Female Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Jessica Tarangioli
published
3.36
Niki Goldberg
published
Ashley Peterson
published 3.5
3.25
Frazer Humes
published
3.08
Margit Patterson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michaela Redlingshafer
15W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Kelsey Cullen
42W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Maggie Dornseif
47W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.45
Jessica Tarangioli
11W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Niki Goldberg
18W–6L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Ashley Peterson
8W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Frazer Humes
16W–0L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Margit Patterson
11W–5L career · no lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.