Teams

Wisehaven - Taylor

2022 USTA 18 & Over League · 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.75 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-07-23vs RCW - RacqueteersLost 03
L#1 DoublesCourtney Blocker / Karen Keeney vs Jen Weber / Chris Haluck1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAnne Brozoskie vs Laura Harkin2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Huster / Jennifer May vs KAREN GETZ / Tara Borgna1-6, 0-6
2022-07-17vs RCW - RacqueteersLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Huster / Courtney Blocker vs Jen Weber / Chris Haluck0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKaren Keeney vs Tara Borgna1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHeidi Nyland / Sharon Rothman vs Laura Harkin / KAREN GETZ0-6, 1-6
2022-07-09vs Hershey - McDoublesLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Keeney / Sandra Koons vs Lucinda McHugh / Dori Pitzner3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAnne Brozoskie vs Tsetsgee Header3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDawn Koons / Heidi Nyland vs Eileen McNulty / Ping He1-6, 0-6
2022-06-25vs Hempfield- Everlasting LobstoppersLost 12
W#1 DoublesSandra Koons / Jennifer May vs Kathleen Kelso / Michelle Christ6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJennifer Huster vs Eileen Culp0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCourtney Blocker / Sharon Rothman vs Flo Moran / Kaye Mede0-6, 1-6
2022-06-11vs Lancaster CC - TsakonasLost 12
L#1 DoublesCourtney Blocker / Karen Keeney vs Whitney Tsakonas / Lee Snyder5-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesViviane Phelps vs Justina Juvonen-Dodge6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDawn Koons / Heidi Nyland vs Stacey Brubaker / Sarah Ganse2-6, 3-6
2022-06-04vs Bent Creek - JaskulisLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Huster / Anne Brozoskie vs Suzan Jaskulis / Shea Erb5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesViviane Phelps vs Stacey Whisman6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJennifer May / Heidi Nyland vs Connie West / Elizabeth Bennett4-6, 1-6
2022-05-25vs Bent Creek - JaskulisWon 30
W#1 DoublesSandra Koons / Viviane Phelps vs Amy Kauffman / Claudia Palandjian6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAnne Brozoskie vs Shea Erb6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Huster / Karen Keeney vs Connie West / Kaitlin Behmer6-2, 7-5
2022-05-17vs Hanover - AndersonWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Keeney / Sandra Koons vs Gail Anderson / Mary Reigart6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesAnne Brozoskie vs Deborah Marshall6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCourtney Blocker / Dawn Koons vs Karen Ebner / Julie Swimley4-6, 4-6
2022-05-14vs Hempfield - Golden TicketsLost 03
L#1 DoublesSandra Koons / Dawn Koons vs Kerrilee Burns / Beth Alderman1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAnne Brozoskie vs Jessica Myers6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer May / Heidi Nyland vs Dorothy Love / Karin Guerrini1-6, 3-6
2022-05-04vs Hempfield - Golden TicketsLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Huster / Sandra Koons vs Kerrilee Burns / Beth Alderman2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAnne Brozoskie vs Jessica Myers5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Keeney / Courtney Blocker vs Emily Keppel / Malena Kramer0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.71
Anne Brozoskie
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.44
Karen Keeney
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Dawn Koons
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Courtney Blocker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Heidi Nyland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Huster
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer May
published
Matthew Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
Sandra Koons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Rothman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Viviane Phelps
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer May + Jennifer Huster033 matchesnot enough data
Karen Keeney + Courtney Blocker033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anne Brozoskie
20W–25L career · 7 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.71
Karen Keeney
21W–41L career · 7 lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
2.44
2.5
Dawn Koons
2W–8L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Courtney Blocker
0W–6L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Heidi Nyland
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer Huster
1W–13L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer May
1W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Matthew Taylor
13W–9L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandra Koons
3W–3L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sharon Rothman
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Viviane Phelps
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.