Teams

Hempfield- Everlasting Lobstoppers

2022 USTA 18 & Over League · 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.70 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-07-21vs Hershey - McDoublesLost 12
L#1 DoublesBeatrix Ray / Linda Mullen vs Patricia Reddy / Dori Pitzner1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesEileen Culp vs Tsetsgee Header1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesFlo Moran / Kathleen Kelso vs Donna Werner / Eileen McNulty6-4, 7-6
2022-07-13vs Bent Creek - JaskulisWon 21
L#1 DoublesNatalie Stern / Faith Kickery vs Suzan Jaskulis / Amy Kauffman7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesEileen Culp vs Stacey Whisman6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesFlo Moran / Beatrix Ray vs Kaitlin Behmer / Elizabeth Bennett6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-07-07vs Hempfield - Golden TicketsLost 12
L#1 DoublesLinda Mullen / Eileen Culp vs Jeanne Sikora / Jessica Myers3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMichelle Christ vs Kerrilee Burns0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKaye Mede / Kathleen Kelso vs Susan Miller / Linda Karns6-2, 6-3
2022-06-25vs Wisehaven - TaylorWon 21
L#1 DoublesKathleen Kelso / Michelle Christ vs Sandra Koons / Jennifer May3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEileen Culp vs Jennifer Huster6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesFlo Moran / Kaye Mede vs Courtney Blocker / Sharon Rothman6-0, 6-1
2022-06-20vs Lancaster CC - TsakonasLost 12
L#1 DoublesNatalie Stern / Beatrix Ray vs Justina Juvonen-Dodge / Lee Snyder2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesKaye Mede vs Sara Heilig6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesFlo Moran / Linda Mullen vs Jill Stoltzfoos / Stacey Brubaker5-7, 3-6
2022-06-15vs Hempfield - Golden TicketsLost 12
L#1 DoublesNatalie Stern / Linda Mullen vs Beth Alderman / Kerrilee Burns0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKaye Mede vs Jessica Myers4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesFlo Moran / Kathleen Kelso vs Emily Keppel / Malena Kramer1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-06-11vs Hershey - McDoublesLost 02
L#1 DoublesFlo Moran / Linda Mullen vs Kate McMullen / Katherine Prough5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEileen Culp / Kathleen Kelso vs Donna Werner / Guerline Ladouceur-Laurore6-7, 3-6
2022-05-26vs RCW - RacqueteersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaye Mede / Michelle Christ vs Chris Haluck / Shari Medini3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesEileen Culp / Faith Kickery vs Melanie DiPerna / Adriana Dalea6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-05-19vs Lancaster CC - TsakonasLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaye Mede / Michelle Christ vs Jill Stoltzfoos / Christina Jemison6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesEileen Culp vs Kaci Christian3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesFaith Kickery / Natalie Stern vs Whitney Tsakonas / Erin Detwiler3-6, 1-6
2022-05-12vs Hanover - AndersonLost 12
L#1 DoublesBeatrix Ray / Lorejean Rigano vs Cheryl A Routzahn / Mary Reigart3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMichelle Christ vs Deborah Marshall2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesFaith Kickery / Natalie Stern vs Gail Anderson / Barbetta Moffatt6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.66
Eileen Culp
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.45
Kaye Mede
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.44
Flo Moran
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
2.44
Linda Mullen
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Beatrix Ray
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Faith Kickery
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 2.5
Kathleen Kelso
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Lorejean Rigano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Christ
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Natalie Stern
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Kelso + Kaye Mede4448% games+13.4% vs expected
Kaye Mede + Flo Moran4546% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Kelso + Flo Moran2437% gamesnot enough data
Linda Mullen + Flo Moran2346% gamesnot enough data
Faith Kickery + Natalie Stern1441% gamesnot enough data
Linda Mullen + Kaye Mede044 matchesnot enough data
Eileen Culp + Faith Kickery134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Eileen Culp
46W–95L career · 11 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Kaye Mede
91W–137L career · 6 lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
2.45
2.5
Flo Moran
30W–95L career · 6 lines in 2022
0%66%34%
2.44
Linda Mullen
13W–102L career · 5 lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
2.44
2.5
Beatrix Ray
4W–25L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Faith Kickery
6W–23L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathleen Kelso
22W–75L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lorejean Rigano
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Christ
2W–8L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Natalie Stern
1W–8L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.