Teams

Hempfield - Golden Tickets

2022 USTA 18 & Over League · 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.92 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-07-13vs Hanover - AndersonWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmily Keppel / Malena Kramer vs Mary Reigart / Deborah Marshall6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJeanne Sikora vs Emma Cockey6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNancy ONeill / Susan Miller vs Gail Anderson / Barbetta Moffatt4-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesJeanne Sikora / Jessica Myers vs Linda Mullen / Eileen Culp6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKerrilee Burns vs Michelle Christ6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Miller / Linda Karns vs Kaye Mede / Kathleen Kelso2-6, 3-6
2022-06-29vs Bent Creek - JaskulisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEmily Keppel / Malena Kramer vs Elina Klinge / Kaitlin Behmer6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNancy ONeill / Jeanne Sikora vs Maureen Leader / Nicole Chiota-McCollum6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2022-06-26vs RCW - RacqueteersLost 03
L#1 DoublesJessica Myers / Jeanne Sikora vs Chris Haluck / Laura Harkin6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBeth Alderman vs Jen Weber4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNancy ONeill / Dorothy Love vs Tara Borgna / Melanie DiPerna2-6, 0-6
2022-06-22vs Hanover - AndersonLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmily Keppel / Malena Kramer vs Karen Ebner / Julie Swimley4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBeth Alderman vs Deborah Marshall6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNancy ONeill / Susan Miller vs Gail Anderson / Barbetta Moffatt4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-06-15vs Hempfield- Everlasting LobstoppersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBeth Alderman / Kerrilee Burns vs Natalie Stern / Linda Mullen6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesEmily Keppel / Malena Kramer vs Flo Moran / Kathleen Kelso6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2022-06-04vs Hershey - McDoublesLost 02
L#1 DoublesDorothy Love / Linda Karns vs Lucinda McHugh / Patricia Reddy1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKarin Guerrini vs Melanie Mathews0-6, 0-6
2022-05-25vs Lancaster CC - TsakonasWon 30
W#1 DoublesNancy ONeill / Kerrilee Burns vs Michele Eynon / Lee Snyder4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKarin Guerrini vs Sarah Ganse6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDorothy Love / Jeanne Sikora vs Erin Detwiler / Jill Stoltzfoos6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2022-05-14vs Wisehaven - TaylorWon 20
W#1 DoublesKerrilee Burns / Beth Alderman vs Sandra Koons / Dawn Koons6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDorothy Love / Karin Guerrini vs Jennifer May / Heidi Nyland6-1, 6-3
2022-05-04vs Wisehaven - TaylorWon 20
W#1 DoublesKerrilee Burns / Beth Alderman vs Jennifer Huster / Sandra Koons6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEmily Keppel / Malena Kramer vs Karen Keeney / Courtney Blocker6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Karin Guerrini
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.43
Beth Alderman
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.66
Eileen Culp
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.42
Jeanne Sikora
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.32
Emily Keppel
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.31
Malena Kramer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.26
Nancy ONeill
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
1.91
Dorothy Love
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Jessica Myers
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kerrilee Burns
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Linda Karns
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eileen Culp + Nancy ONeill3443% games+3.6% vs expected
Malena Kramer + Emily Keppel51642% games−2.9% vs expected
Nancy ONeill + Dorothy Love0723% games−7.7% vs expected
Beth Alderman + Kerrilee Burns303 matchesnot enough data
Eileen Culp + Jessica Myers123 matchesnot enough data
Eileen Culp + Dorothy Love033 matchesnot enough data
Nancy ONeill + Emily Keppel033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karin Guerrini
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2022
>99%<1%0%
3.62
3.5
Beth Alderman
124W–45L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.43
3
Eileen Culp
46W–95L career · 11 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Jeanne Sikora
21W–34L career · 5 lines in 2022
74%26%<1%
2.42
3
Emily Keppel
25W–58L career · 5 lines in 2022
92%8%<1%
2.32
2.5
Malena Kramer
32W–48L career · 5 lines in 2022
0%92%8%
2.31
Nancy ONeill
37W–100L career · 9 lines in 2022
0%97%3%
2.26
2.5
Dorothy Love
13W–61L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
1.91
Jessica Myers
8W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kerrilee Burns
5W–0L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Karns
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.