Teams

CIN A18 4.0M IHP Fischer

Winter USTA Central Indiana Adult 18 & Over · CIN Indy 18 & Over 4.0 Men, W

13 players · average NTRP 4.25 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-02-18vs CIN A18 4.0M WIRC BrunerWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndrew Airgood / Marco Vasquez vs Todd Meeks / Paul Musson6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesRyan Fischer vs Jason Hays4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesGeorge Go / Nick Kellum vs Larry Stropes / Jay Wetzel5-7, 4-3, 1-0
2025-02-11vs CIN A18 4.0M IUTC PiekarskyLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatrick Toth / Joshua Ruse vs Colton Butcher / Jeremy Earle6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJeff Furois vs Sungyun Kang4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRyan Fischer / Marco Vasquez vs David Dzubay / Paul Dzubay6-3, 7-5
2025-02-04vs CIN A18 4.0M WIRC YangWon 30
W#1 DoublesJustin Nevitt / Andrew Airgood vs Will Pearl / Bill Ratthahao7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJoshua Ruse vs Morris Yang6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPatrick Toth / Nick Kellum vs Chong Cha / Dan Fox6-3, 6-2
2025-01-28vs CIN A18 4.0M IRCD SinghWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarco Vasquez / Joshua Ruse vs Charles Hinkle / Denis Ryan6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesGeorge Go vs Bryce Sadler6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJeff Furois / Nick Kellum vs Matthew Meyer / Christopher Hines7-6, 6-1
2025-01-21vs CIN A18 4.0M IRCD LoweryWon 30
W#1 DoublesPatrick Toth / Joshua Ruse vs Ezekiel Dixon / Nick Bantz6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAndrew Airgood vs Daniel Lomelino6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRyan Page / Jeff Furois vs Alex Fohl / Gary DeCastro6-3, 6-4
2025-01-14vs CIN A18 4.0M IRCD BocadeLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Hamilton / Justin Nevitt vs Richard Yu / Zach Richardson3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJoshua Ruse vs Arjun Bhalla7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJeff Furois / Blake Orner vs Jeffrey Curry / Michael Wade1-6, 2-6
2025-01-07vs CIN A18 4.0M CRC HusmannWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndrew Airgood / Ryan Page vs Greer MacKebee / Eric Murphy6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesGeorge Go vs Kurt Langdon6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRyan Fischer / Marco Vasquez vs Jeff Springer / Brandon Grubb7-6, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · CIN Indy 18 & Over 4.0 Men, W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CIN A18 4.0M JCC Barrett6016212155
2CIN A18 4.0M IRCD Bocade6115620175
3CIN A18 4.0M IHP Fischer5215615150
4CIN A18 4.0M CRC Husmann4313819164
5CIN A18 4.0M WIRC Bruner4312921172
6CIN A18 4.0M IUTC Piekarsky43111023187
7CIN A18 4.0M IRCD Singh43101124203
8CIN A18 4.0M IRCD Wilhite2481022161
9CIN A18 4.0M CRC Nelson1531530201
10CIN A18 4.0M WIRC Yang1641734227
11CIN A18 4.0M IRCD Lowery0741738240

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Airgood
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.03
George Go
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.87
Marco Vasquez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.80
Jeff Furois
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.69
Nick Kellum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Blake Orner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Ryan Fischer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.57
Patrick Toth
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.52
Joshua Ruse
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.46
Jeffrey Hamilton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Justin Nevitt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ryan Page
published
TJ Ehrman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joshua Ruse + Patrick Toth5162% games+17.5% vs expected
Marco Vasquez + Jeffrey Hamilton8165% gamesnot enough data
Ryan Page + Marco Vasquez8063% gamesnot enough data
Blake Orner + Jeff Furois314 matchesnot enough data
Nick Kellum + Jeff Furois314 matchesnot enough data
Justin Nevitt + Jeffrey Hamilton134 matchesnot enough data
George Go + Marco Vasquez303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Airgood
128W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
George Go
41W–50L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
4.03
Marco Vasquez
42W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.87
Jeff Furois
29W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Nick Kellum
12W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.69
4
Blake Orner
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Ryan Fischer
68W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.63
Patrick Toth
31W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
Joshua Ruse
43W–40L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.52
Jeffrey Hamilton
29W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.46
Justin Nevitt
39W–61L career · 2 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
Ryan Page
18W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
TJ Ehrman
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.