Teams

CIN A18 4.0M IRCD Wilhite

Winter USTA Central Indiana Adult 18 & Over · CIN Indy 18 & Over 4.0 Men, W

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-09vs CIN A18 4.0M CRC NelsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Harker / Carlos Spencer vs Kevin Chu / Jamey Squires4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesAndrew Kremer vs Sean Warner4-6, 4-5
W#2 DoublesHAI GENG / Yang Xiao vs Daniel Nelson / Tony Peters6-3, 6-4
2025-03-02vs CIN A18 4.0M JCC BarrettLost 03
L#1 DoublesHAI GENG / Mazin Jaliwala vs Justin Smith / Kirk Webber7-6, 5-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAndrew Kremer vs Jackson Barrett1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRyan Wilhite / Kevin Schwartz vs Jim Jacobi / Steven Gutzwiller6-7, 6-0, 0-1
2025-02-16vs CIN A18 4.0M CRC NelsonWon 30
W#1 DoublesSteven Kim / Carlos Spencer vs Steven Warner / Sean Warner7-6, 4-3
W#1 SinglesMichael Surak vs Andy Esakia3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRyan Wilhite / Kevin Schwartz vs Daniel Nelson / Jamey Squires6-2, 6-1
2025-02-09vs CIN A18 4.0M JCC BarrettSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDavid Harker / Andrew Kremer vs Steven Gutzwiller / Jason Hostetler3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMichael Surak vs Justin Smith6-4, 6-3
2025-01-26vs CIN A18 4.0M CRC NelsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Harker / Carlos Spencer vs James Ferguson / Nicholas Winings7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMazin Jaliwala / Ryan Wilhite vs Daniel Nelson / Tony Peters6-1, 6-0
2025-01-19vs CIN A18 4.0M JCC BarrettLost 01
L#2 DoublesRyan Wilhite / Kevin Schwartz vs Drew Manning / Steven Gutzwiller6-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · CIN Indy 18 & Over 4.0 Men, W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CIN A18 4.0M JCC Barrett6016212155
2CIN A18 4.0M IRCD Bocade6115620175
3CIN A18 4.0M IHP Fischer5215615150
4CIN A18 4.0M CRC Husmann4313819164
5CIN A18 4.0M WIRC Bruner4312921172
6CIN A18 4.0M IUTC Piekarsky43111023187
7CIN A18 4.0M IRCD Singh43101124203
8CIN A18 4.0M IRCD Wilhite2481022161
9CIN A18 4.0M CRC Nelson1531530201
10CIN A18 4.0M WIRC Yang1641734227
11CIN A18 4.0M IRCD Lowery0741738240

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Kremer
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
David Harker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Ryan Wilhite
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Michael Surak
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
Mazin Jaliwala
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Carlos Spencer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
HAI GENG
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kevin Schwartz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Yang Xiao
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Wilhite + Kevin Schwartz7359% games+1.5% vs expected
David Harker + Yang Xiao3347% gamesnot enough data
HAI GENG + Yang Xiao213 matchesnot enough data
HAI GENG + Mazin Jaliwala123 matchesnot enough data
Yang Xiao + Mazin Jaliwala123 matchesnot enough data
Carlos Spencer + Mazin Jaliwala033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Kremer
19W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Christopher Henderson
3W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
David Harker
64W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Wilhite
25W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Michael Surak
59W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Mazin Jaliwala
18W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Carlos Spencer
23W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
HAI GENG
20W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.42
Kevin Schwartz
38W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yang Xiao
45W–29L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.